Frage von Dino:
Hello Professionals,
I am an amateur video, in addition to the usual family gatherings and vacations especially concert recordings and takes theater. In addition, I turn occasionally small adventure films with children. So far I am with my Canon MV 300i MiniDV Camera zurande been more badly. Now I'm thinking to upgrade and have taken in my budget of EUR 1,000, the Panasonic NV-GS 500 in the eye. In addition to your opinion, whether you keep what is a good choice, or something else recommends me, I still have some specific questions s.euch (s.Beispiel these two cameras, but they are certainly transferable):
1. How much of the higher Resolutiondurch the more pixels, and the 3 CCD chips properly after editing it in an editing program left? On the MiniDV tape is certainly more s.als on the DVD to MPEG compression, but synonymous DV-PAL is working but with a defined number of pixels that is less than that absorbs the camera. Is recognized when it is rendered to a DVD of the quality advantage of anything?
2. Can (in principle) all MiniDV cameras synonymous read the tapes, which were included with another MiniDV camera? Say, can I play with the Panasonic NV-GS 500 my archived tapes of the Canon MV 300i, and vice versa?
3. And how is it when I full screen mode, the Panasonic NV-GS 500 use? The old Canon will not start so well know, but the pictures in editing program (in my case FCE) as well read as the "normal" shots in the field mode? And I can these photographs (half-and full-screen) when cutting synonymous mix?
I would be really grateful to you if you would help me. Sure everything is somewhere in clever books, but until I have found the crucial understood and we have already determined two camera again and again I'm beginning next generation of on the front!
Dino
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
1. Yes, thanks to larger sensors, especially when less light is better than the small picture to see 1 / 6 "CCD, entry-level, synonymous the Lenses of the more expensive models to bring a small + Point, Leica s.GS 280, Zeiss Sonnar T * s.HC 94 . In the new one or the other Pana new signal processors (digicam is the Venus Engine III - built-TZ 1) to process the separated luminance and color noise eg synonymous rausholen and even more so, unfortunately, Pana hard information, what exactly built into video cameras, with photo snapping, it is easier rauszubekommen.
2. I had myself tested 2005 all 4 large companies, Canon, JVC, Panasonic and Sonykonnten understand each other, synonymous LP could read all 4 of its competitors, among them was the synonymous Identical Canon MVX 350i, JVC GR D 290, Panasonic GS 250 and SonyHC 90 .
3. Full-screen mode, the GS 500 is synonymous only a "Simulated", probably 1 / 25 sec, as many do's and join two fields ". That we are dealing with fields provides s.Television one that could not constitute pure frames, since we are in the PC area.
Well DV editing, sorry I can not tell you.
Hab mal grade tested Canon MVX 45i / MVX 460 have recognized 25 P mode, the GS 500 as a normal signal.
LG
Jan
Antwort von roberto:
Hi
Yes you can mix the two, a cut masters program that already.
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Have played again, the camera uses the same exposure in the Pro Cinema mode, 25 P, as in standard DV mode, shutter 1% 50 was synonymous with aperture 4 with 0 DB gain in two Modus'en.
Canon MVX 45i has no problems and it played it just like normal material detected.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Have played again, the camera uses the same exposure in the Pro Cinema mode, 25 P, as in standard DV mode, shutter was synonymous 1 / 50 with aperture 4 with 0 DB gain in two Modus'en.
Canon MVX 45i has no problems and it played it just like normal material detected.
LG
Jan
Was I
Antwort von Dino:
Thank you for the answers and the tests. Seems to be all relatively straightforward.
At the moment I wonder if maybe I should buy the 500 instead of 400, although that is still more expensive (see thread).
Dino
Antwort von beiti:
1. The quality of images depends not only on the resolution. Any DV camcorder to tape takes up 720 x 576 pixels, no preference how many pixels the chip has, or how many chips are installed. Still images from "good" camcorder more details. Is so similar to digital cameras: A high-quality 3-MP camera often shows more detail than a 6-MP Camera from discounters.
Back to Video: After editing, the editing program and the return games onto DV tape you have) is still 100% quality (lossless editing, that's the beauty s.Digitalvideo.
If you s.Computer render to MPEG2 (for DVD), there are certain losses (eg artifacts during fast motion) in the Picture. These losses can be minimized, however, when do you use a good encoder and a high data rate. Ideally, you will see no difference to the DV original.
3. Full-screen mode you should not use at all. Has in practice only if there is good and disadvantages as the effect of special cases.
