Frage von d4rkblu3:
Hi folks,
I have now since its hour through the Forum struggled, but I have come to no results.
I have the following problem:
I have a Syncmaster 223BW with dvi connection. So: now I wanted to use the TFT as a television and have it with a DVI> HDMI cable s.einen Satellite Receiver with HDMI port, comes on but no picture. But if I gespeichertses to a program without any signal, I see at least sometimes the menu from the receiver.
I have been synonymous all sorts of settings s.AReceiver tried because HDMI 480 HDMI 57? etc.
Do happy shooting. Thank you
Antwort von d4rkblu3:
Aso forget ...
Receiver: COMAG SL45 HDMI
Antwort von WideScreen:
Do not know, but could s.Kopierschutz is via the HDMI output? Know the receiver, but the monitor is HDCP certainly can not.
Just an idea ....
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Also look at
diesethis
Antwort von WoWu:
@ D4rkblu3
Do not rely on this discussion.
If it really should be that the receiver is HDCP will nix with the adaptation of HDMI to DVI because HDMI audio are synonymous over (and secure). The difference at the protocol level, a few bits that make the difference, however, that the sender and receiver no longer understand. In addition, the encryption means on which the content Ausgabefomat "seen" to be. So s.einem HDMI HDCP should be synonymous with an HDMI hang.
There are predefined format, in the form of default synonymous of the monitor must be accepted ... synonymous because a problem may lie.
Edit: I still falls, that of course synonymous s.der synchronization may be because clock and data lines with DVI on are transferred to a multiple of the signal wavelength are. (should be) is not true, there are time differences, the individual adjustment of the phase angle required. Happening but not 100%, you have one or two pixels s.Anfang one line too much or too little.
If we but instead of the uncompressed image Picture encrypted, then each bit in the data are equally important: Does only one synchronization error in the period between two Neusynchronisationen encryption, then delivers the Dekryptor in the recipient s.diesem time only baffling stuff instead of a image!
HDCP and DVI is a problematic combination.
Ever .... DVI is HDCP certified monitor really? Otherwise, does it anyway because he is not "key" has.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
If it really should be that the receiver is HDCP will nix with the adaptation of HDMI to DVI because HDMI audio are synonymous over (and secure). The sound is irrelevant.
The difference at the protocol level, a few bits that make the difference, however, that the sender and receiver no longer understand. That would be a great copy of with a few bits in the data could even nullify.
In addition, the encryption means on which the content Ausgabefomat "seen" to be. So s.einem HDMI HDCP should be synonymous with an HDMI hang. Nonsense. An HDCP-capable DVI input ranges. We must stop the sound of parallel lead.
There are predefined format, in the form of default synonymous of the monitor must be accepted ... That is correct. That is but synonymous in the linked articles.
HDCP and DVI is a problematic combination. HDCP and HDMI synonymous. In leaves, such as the 'audiovision' you can ever read what is between HDMI devices not everything works out.
Ever .... DVI is HDCP certified monitor really? Otherwise, does it anyway Nothing else is in the other discussions, Mr. Wunderlich.
Because he is not "key" has. Is the German word key broken?
------------
Throats but times - and then spit out more beautiful!
Antwort von WoWu:
The sound is irrelevant. Context does not understand!
That would be a great copy of with a few bits in the data could even nullify. Context does not understand!
Nonsense. An HDCP-capable DVI input ranges. We must stop the sound of parallel lead. Context does not understand!
HDCP and HDMI synonymous. Wrong!
In leaves, such as the 'audiovision' you can ever read what is between HDMI devices not everything works out. No wonder that relationships are not understood.
Get the class of your once properly explained.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Get the class of your once properly explained. Have you prefer a new way of saying - and work in the matter.
-----------
Throats but times - and then spit out more beautiful!
Antwort von WoWu:
With over 10 years experience in Conditional Access, I am fairly well incorporated ... since then, I need not synonymous magazines more ....
Antwort von Quadruplex:
With over 10 years experience in Conditional Access, I am fairly well incorporated ... Why do you know it not better? Or if you have understood it right: Why press so unclear from? No good publicity for the rind ...
-----------
Throats but times - and then spit out more beautiful!
Antwort von WoWu:
Sometimes one does not reach the level that is understandable to each.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
since then, I need not synonymous magazines more .... You have no idea of the real problems with HDMI / HDCP and are narrow enough not to want to know better. Pride comes before the fall ...
------------
Throats but times - and then spit out more beautiful!
Antwort von WoWu:
Eben but ... and precisely
why I use no "yellow press".
Antwort von Quadruplex:
and precisely why I use no "yellow press". Mr. Wunderlich - You're already great. When your name is the program - really!
The most competent home theater magazine of Germany as gossip press dismiss (as well as the
Antwort von WoWu:
Once again not read carefully enough ....
.... only accurate reading does not clever and simple chatter ....
(as well as the most competent German computer magazine) ... and, moreover, is so just exactly is the problem.
