Frage von koji:
I'm shopping for in heavily on the objective of coming to ask for the 7D and views here have a small selection list of what I believe to be good:
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8
Canon 50mm f/1.8
Canon 50mm f/1.4
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8
Unfortunately I have no experience with Contax and Yashica. supposed to have these fine manufacturers synonymous lenses for a decent DOF.
what would you recommend?
Antwort von JonasB:
So, two 50mm you will not be to take it?
Repays the 1.4 (if the aperture is the only difference).
Zooms are not recommended synonymous to synonymous if they are not at fainter. If you move the zoom is not mandatory for your movie will not need it'll take. Lenses tend to have nicer Bohek.
Besides, you need to speak 2 Follow Focus and a lot of exercise to zoom and sharpness control at the same time.
What kind of budget do you have the Lenses for?
For low budget, when you have lying around the Lenses at home, so we're well equipped.
Besser geht immer;)
As I said, I'd rather avoid buying zooms.
MFG
Jonas
Antwort von Neufilmerin:
Canon 50mm f/1.4 The lens I use myself and can recommend it. :-)
Antwort von koji:
I would like to take my 18-135mm set. objectively but mainly for photos.
I want to use no follow focus. for I lack the time to convert and to be honest with the prices, the monetary synonymous. the only viable affordable is the minimum of Redrock (550. -). the dfocus and co can forget (speaking only for what I've read). all delicate.
I might have forgotten two canon FD 28mm and 50mm lenses with 1.4 but unfortunately can DSLR forum, according to the adapter. so I have to probably buy a new festbrennweite.
the price different from the 1.4 50mm on 1.8 ()'s just huge. one can get scarce 90th - and the other for 340th --
that's a glaring differences.
There are affordable zoomobektive synonymous with 1.4?
Antwort von Zizi:
There are affordable zoomobektive synonymous with 1.4? No!
This is the least expensive of Canon 50mm and this is not a zoom!
I think 1.4 is technically
not feasible to zoom anyway!
Antwort von Neufilmerin:
the price different from the 1.4 50mm on 1.8 ()'s just huge. one can get scarce 90th - and the other for 340th --
that's a glaring differences. I have re-paid under 300 euros, and think that it is worth the expenditure.
If you so much money for the new Canon will pay, then you certainly should not s.Lens save.
Antwort von JonasB:
No ^ ^ Zoom with 1.4 is a dream: P
When you save will have to take the 1.8. 1.4 goes into the professional direction ... you only notice the big difference in photos.
FD need to be in no ... ne in Lens Adapter for the infinite.
But you can look for old Nikon, which can be used synonymous with adapter.
But if you make synonymous photos you see, then take the EF 50mm 1.8. An old Nikon would be better though but there is no haste in the auto focus can sometimes photos can help.
MFG
Jonas
Antwort von Neufilmerin:
... notice the big difference is only in photos.
Not only when you shoot.
Both times Lenses in your hand and look synonymous to the processing, etc..
Antwort von koji:
There are affordable zoomobektive synonymous with 1.4?
No!
This is the least expensive of Canon 50mm and this is not a zoom!
This is already clear to me.
is the question that imposes itself to me only, I lose a lot of DOF in a variety of 0.4? if so, I would get myself of course, the 1.4.
Antwort von ef.multimedia:
If you are on a plastic mount, it'll take the 50 f1, 8 :-)
I would personally use a camera s.so only Canon L-lenses. The other would be a violation of the zoom camera.
For the video mode would be synonymous HS Zeiss optics make sense. In the rental gibts quite cheap.
Antwort von koji:
I am currently considering whether Zeiss 50mm 1.4 or canon but the. The zeiss is only used to have - at my local dealer for 150th --
the video recordings with the zeiss look fine. nice DOF
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Take a Nikon 50/1.4, which costs less and looks good. Adapter ring will cost $ 20 and works without any glass between them.
I have several 5DMKII, and not a single Canon Lens. AF? Rubbish before the shooting.
Zoom is no objection against anything, so long as he stays with Aperture 2.8. You can forget this Billigzooms of Tamron and Co, with Aperture 6.3, as night is dark artifacts announced. What is done is Nikon 35-70 f/2.8 or the Nikon 24-85 f/2.8-4.0 synonymous. What is not at are fuzzy plastic lenses of Sigma & Co., had never seen the Optics of Sigma's any good, no zoom, or FB. If between two seemingly identical lenses is a price difference of 50%, then it is justified. The Bokeh is obviously stronger because of higher light intensity at FB, but that we can carefully crafting a 50er or 35er using 1.4, the rest do you do with the zoom and good.
My recommendation for a small budget:
Nikon 50 f/1.4 (with 200)
Nikon 24-85 (used p.400 EUR)
Erstmal so that you are completely covered. And then to expand to and with
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 (500)
Nikon 85 f/1.4 (s.700 EUR)
Nikon 35 f/1.4 (p.400 EUR)
Edit: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 ... is a Burner! 200mm Focal Aperture 2.8 is synonymous with hardly a better FB.
MB
Antwort von Zizi:
404ERR
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Well Marc, it is expensive synonymous of good FB Sigma ;-)
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Zizi:
My recommendation for a small budget:
Nikon 50 f/1.4 (with 200)
Nikon 24-85 (used p.400 EUR) I do not think .. You say that probably because you've bought yourself Nikkor lenses and now you're the sour the great update a bill has been passed by the) (manual aperture?
Nikkor can you buy if you want to shoot with a Nikon D90 ..
Purchase your lenses rather than something comparable Sigma / Tamron!
You will not remember And you can order different synonymous photography!
Aja .. Sigma has a few lenses, the Canon's Locker in Figure Awesome! However, this is in anyway comparable FullHD shit and no preference for Stillimage synonymous only with direct visible!
Look for good light easy to shoot as little as possible about it to 1000 ISO images with good camera work look very very professional!
Antwort von koji:
at the moment, I tend more to the Canon 1.4 or the Zeiss 1.4 (because half of the price). would not necessarily synonymous with Nikon adapter. And I was never nikon fan and then run dinger with adapter ... then I'll take you prefer the Canon. Although the Sigma I would consider synonymous to me.
We'll see what Tamron has so s.FB.
Antwort von Zizi:
We'll see what Tamron has so s.FB. There's nothing much .. Only the 90mm 2.8 and 60mm 2.0, both the full-fledged distortion-free super-macro!
At Tamron zooms are only good for the video .. I find the 28-75mm 2.8 ideally suited for video and costs very little and the 70-200mm 2.8 which is superior in sharpness, especially for the Canon, even Photos!
More brightness and image quality are few, especially for the price!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
So nen Rubbish
So Sigma and Tamaron can be compared with not at Nikon or Canon.
The Marc Nikkor should indeed be very clear and well justified if one wants to stay in a price range of this class or do.
The manual lenses now be badly after update, silly!
Clear Conclusion So choose Nikkor lenses from FD
Or more money to lie down and buy Leica or Schneider - all of course, manual
Buy Photos AF For Canon L IS. No. Sigma and Tamron lenses.
t. .................................. .............. ...........
And when I mentioned the good is synonymous Sigma FB Marc wrote then there will already know who and what I meant, and is synonymous to realize that I do "not" related to video.
.................................................. .............
Remember - only the Lenses that change to include the case anyway, all a good 2 years Optics eigenlich never or rarely!
MfG
B. DeKid
5 good FB for manual lenses you will pay approximately EUR 15 000 make with 2 other Zoom 3 other AF and FB 2 -3 at about 30 000, plus special optics meaningful Camera and accessories (no flash / light) about 35 - 40 000 Euro
This case is light and you Tripods ca 50 - 60 000 euros going on - then we can talk more of is good SetUp.
So please stay here once realistic, since the camera is the least expensive purchase! And we still talk of KB cameras that can be synonymous film ;-)
Whether the cameras are better than EB where optics can cost has only a 50 000 that is a different question.
I perso. I must say, many FD lenses and Pentax and Minolta have the quality Nikkor some clear characteristics that the FD lenses do not just make it the favorite.
PS: But the suitcase is packed into the Equitment cost more than 1500Euro so who intressiert then even more lenses for under $ 1000?
For 1000 euros to buy himself a few times until s.anfang lenses to play - that is synonymous justified, but it is equivalent to synonymous only "toy" and should not buy the State of Art Equitment and according to what one they wanted Stillimage and video produce the highest quality.
Bring everything nothing if, as Powermac said in another thread, the story brings nothing and the guys s.Set not work well together ;-)
Antwort von koji:
I'd have two good Canon FD lenses with which I would be synonymous satisfied (50mm/1.4 and 24/2.8) but unfortunately there is no reasonable board, according DSLR adapter.
I think after I got a lot on the Zeiss now read that I decide for the 50mm Zeiss. Should be in terms of quality and processing are still on Canon and Nikkor. 150th of the price - is indeed very Ok.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Sure, there are good FD to EF adapter, a cost of about 50 euros ... Lens is in the middle, I do not know why that should not be vernümpftig?
I often work s.Balgen (macro) with the FD lenses and one FD to EF adapter
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von koji:
See answer here:
http://www.dslr-forum.de/showthread.php?t=545738
"Imaging performance is greatly deteriorated."
"recommended? - None"
etc.
EDIT: or synonymous here:
http://www.dslr-forum.de/showthread.php?t=100844&highlight=Adapters+EF
Antwort von Zizi:
I knew up to infinity focus and aperture rings and classic whose Bokeh no single advantage of this extremely expensive lenses?
Besides these if you want to film with a 7D, I'm going clear this time out he does not want to spend ¬ 60,000 for a "setup"!
Therefore remains for video - especially for video s.besten aperture Sigma and Tamron? The cheapest way between video quality and price if you still want to take pictures synonymous with it!
And do not tell me which one of the H264 2MP garbage between 2000 ¬ and 300 ¬ Zeiss Tamron notice a visible difference in picture!
I tried even with habs noticed 2x teleconverter you down to the Bokeh .. no big differences at Stillimage this is of course what else!
I believe this Page
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=473&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=115&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
sets out clearly the hype around the whole optics Canon / Nikkor / Zeiss wenns just goes to video and even sometimes killed Stillimage is total rubbish!
But here is synonymous .. pfurz image quality, you'll pay for a 10-fold s.price in the end anyway hardly anyone sees
With frightening thing I have to say after spending vast sums of of L lenses!
Clear Lenses good cost much more money .. The question is always stop what it claims, the buyer, and I find that one on a 5000 ¬ no 7D lenses especially when comes to video needs!
Antwort von koji:
zizi, I'm basically completely on your side. For my gebrauch - mainly for filming and then another 1-2 schnappschüsse hobby does something soon. I will not issue synonymous 60,000. so will only halfway decent DOF and off.
When I come to the look-head, then I like the sigma actually better. The 85mm Zeiss synonymous looks nice.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Say yes synonymous None the one that must and it is so good that one buys once Lenses and she can use it forever to keep.
Only penny-pinching should not just operate in lenses.
And since I would perso. not just put on Sigma or Tamaron!
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
I use the Nikkor 35mm adapter s.allen we have so s.den and Canon cams. Why? Because they are the best lenses that easily. It is synonymous with good taste Security Zeiss and Canon, but certainly not equal the half with (Sigma, Tamron, ...)
I bought in the spring to 30-40 Lenses, Sigma and Tokina querbeet of, of wide-telephoto Anglebis everything up to Aperture 2.8. I remember the good, the rest has landed on eBay.
The difference between a good lens and a lens is especially Bill the sharpness and contrast with the door open so that the clean aperture - because ONLY reason it still goes around the open-Shooting with Aperture! Anyone who has seen the direct Comparison between a Nikon 85mm f/1.4 and a cheap 85er, will never touch it again a cheap Optics, never again. The Picture of cheap optics is simply unusable mud at open aperture, and this is really a rule, of which there is no exception, because you can look at all the test reports that it has ever been.
Who s.Optiken saves himself is to blame. Both of my lenses are called entry from my own experience sharp into the corners with an open aperture.
And regarding the question of whether to H264 Compression and looks like a difference: Yes, you can see him, just like man with one eye on YouTube still clearly recognizes that there is a difference between a Hollywood ham fat shone a German Mittelklassefllm. Were it not so, we could shoot all with the phone, right?
When I come to the look-head, then I like the sigma actually better. The 85mm Zeiss synonymous looks nice. You should already know whether you want to drive a Porsche or Fiat. The one excludes the idea that that is categorically different.
MB
