Frage von *the.jokeR*:
http://www.thomann.de/de/the_tbone_em_9600.htm THE T. BONE EM9600
http://www.thomann.de/de/audio_technica_atr55.htm AUDIO TECHNICA ATR55
Yes the title says everything ... eigendlich My personal favourit is eigendlich just AUDIO TECHNICA ATR55 because you are not an extra adapter plug on 3.5 and needs a battery as a power supply used ...
Thank you for all answer.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
ATR55 because ... as battery power is used. The 1.5 V battery can be in two microphones to use as a current supplier.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Rudy01:
Ne question time: Is this the ATR-55 Thomann of an error, or is it really a frequency response of 80kHz to have (although I use the low value, so s.70Hz s.sich not so great.) 80 (eighty) Khz but is completely inaudible in the area, or?
I know this otherwise rather Mikros with a frequency response of - shall we say .. 20 Hz to 22KHz and similar.
Time ne other question (slightly off-topic):
What do you really of the T-Bone SC450? I mean of course only for dubbing and non s.eine Camera to see it as, I have the USB version to use and find the sound really cool. And you can record content directly, without pre-amp, because it is powered via USB.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
up to 80kHz Is apparently an error of Thomann Instead there should be 80,000 to 18,000 Hz.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von *the.jokeR*:
and looks like from now? which is of the equipment / Value for money s.besten?
Antwort von Rovi75:
What do you really of the T-Bone SC450? S.besten times to review under the www.homerecording.de punkt service -> product reviews. There are clearly more linear price class microphones, but if you so "only" overdubbed be no disadvantage. It has a decent mid-raising, what is good for the speech intelligibility is. In a studio environment you can see something but not really so happy, because the sound man will prefer a completely neutral and have Mic then the sound itself "model".
All in all: Is better in the price category, but a bad it really is not. Achso: the honor to refer to the "normal" version, ie without USB. What makes this USB Mics are concerned, yes, the market is only just emerging and I still falls just a model of Samson On. Tells you what kind of transformer in the mic is (How many bits and hertz?) Did somebody take a Comparison of the XLR variant on a decent preamp to the USB version you heard?
Lieben Gruß [/ quote]
Antwort von Rovi75:
which is of the equipment / Value for money s.besten? I would take the AT, because I imagine the one under which the dispersion quality audio Technika something better might be like the T-Bone OEM things (but by no means bad, but rather a time-mic on Mondays). Furthermore, there is something more s.accessories here.
For the T-Bone speaks but in any case, the XLR - Link. Think the time is symmetrical. That can not be underestimated advantage, if you are an external recording device like (irgendwan) as long as you do in the mini-jack your cam going, but it is not for you of significant, likely because only unbalanced eh go.
Note: AT on the cable is only 90 cm. The next heist will extend the fishing. It should be as few times and use the extensions, especially for unbalanced.
And: The AT is a kidney, the T-Bone a super cardioid. If you speak angels, should the super cardioid be a bit better.
Severe decision. Would tend to AT (especially for only 20 ¬ difference), but cable and characteristics I would sT-thing better.
Antwort von *the.jokeR*:
ok thanks for the reply I think I will take the AT ... the idea came to me NEN new mic to pick me just because I eigendlich the camera internal mic of the sony dcr-hc94e are too many annoying noises has recorded ... Finally, the question:
tonangel what would you recommend?:
http://search.ebay.de/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http% 3A% 2F% 2Fcgi.ebay.de% 2Fws% 2F & FKR = 1 & from = R8 & satitle = tonangel & category0 =
