Frage von Butzow:
Hope it's here is a knowledgeable, who can help me.
I vacillate between following audio recorders:
http://www.thomann.de/de/tascam_dr100.htm
http://www.thomann.de/de/marantz_pmd_661.htm?sid=f678b66ee190473d8272b8786c1a3348
http://www.thomann.de/de/marantz_pmd671.htm
http://www.thomann.de/de/tascam_hdp2.htm
I want to dump as much as necessary, but as little as possible. Hope you can help me to decide.
Especially of interest to me would be:
1.Braucht one or is the BWF WAV-ability?
(; What are the advantages of the Broadcast Wave Format)
2. Is it difficult to synchronize the recordings later, with the imagery, or you need convincing results for a player with Time Code recording?
(; I read that as in the case of the Zoom H4-N will be difficult to get Picture and sound synchronously)
3. In which situations do I need a limiter?
(; oddly enough, the Marantz pmd_661 in contrast to
Tascam DR 100 that is not, although I think the latter for the device ausgewachsenere)
Thanks in advance.
Antwort von hofnarr:
What are the advantages of the Broadcast Wave Format broadcast wave is beneficial especially when the possibilities of the formats can be exploited in the post-production, or for archival purposes. The metadata are - once entered - a permanent component of the wave file (; eg content description, important additional information, etc.). in principle similar to the id3 tags for mp3, but with more possibilities ...
Is it difficult to synchronize the recordings later, with the imagery, or you need convincing results for a player with Time Code recording? sequences with short, it should be any major problems. hours of recordings can have diverging views, but in general are the little digital boxes very useful. the most elegant solution is of course a set of timecodeverkopplung visual-and sound recorders. there must be synonymous, but the play equipment. H4N the zoom I was able to briefly probehören. for the price not bad ...
In which situations do I need a limiter?
A limiter is always useful when one is surprised with unexpected preset to the top. inclusion in the driven limiter may sound strange, mostly, but still more tolerable than an overdriven recording ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Bzgl. Timecode
synonymous to the camera takes a TC Out port (; looks like an XLR connector)
I think going through SPDIF dieAusgabe synonymous of the TC, I know but not 100%
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Butzow:
Thanks, you've already weitergeholfen much.
My current camera (; Panasonic nv gs1) does not have the two ports, but I wanted to in the foreseeable future (get a new, possibly a Panasonic HPX 171 or equivalent).
Until then, you think that without a precise time code synchro, the more professional and Picture and Sound Recorder will not run as fast apart again, as with the cheaper or take nothing?
Another difference I have yet been found. The great example Tascam has a maximum sampling rate of 192 kHz, while the small has to offer only 48khz. If the difference is audible?
Tend to which the equipment you would?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
I perso. Tell buying something that is synonymous TC so you've got a better cam if you can use this function.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von hofnarr:
in comparison with earlier analog machine is by design even the most favorable among the nearly digital recorders exemplary in terms of the concurrent fluctuations. problems with misalignment between fine clay and not necessarily synonymous occur. some equipment combinations halt run better than others, but they noted that until the current operation. I would take one of the cheaper recorder. the tascam hd-p2 is indeed a fine device, it can exploit its potential, but only in combination with corresponding high-quality microphones ...
with 48khz sampling rate you are well served adequately. The differences between recordings with 48khz sampling frequency of 192kHz and usually only hear people who hear the grass grow synonymous else ;-)
is interesting because even the 24bit word length. which facilitates the proper dowry, and brings significant advantages in the post-processing of the recording, if required ...
Antwort von markus2h:
In the price category in which you move, I would look at the following office equipment s.deiner times.
http://www.thomann.de/de/edirol_r44.htm
Possession of it (though, not yet), but was allowed time to work with it, fine thing.
Antwort von Butzow:
Thank you all for your help, am now much wiser.
S.Rande little question: You know, making the so-called self-noise of the equipment is due (;'ve got them in connection with the Tascam Dr-100 is one where it was said that he was) quite low
And it is synonymous with the technical term noise?
Look what the manufacturer's specifications, you can see the value?
Antwort von hofnarr:
self-noise generated by the circuit components in the instrument, without the assistance of an external source of interference. thermal noise would be temperature dependent. Both can be achieved by proper selection of the component and circuit design to keep low.
The noise actually defines only the ratio of signal to noise signal of a signal source. the self-noise is known in the German space rather than SNR or failing noise level. be in the English-noise ratio and / or happy SNR as signal-to-noise (; indicated snr or s / n). There is still synonymous to different measurement methods and rating curves, the manufacturer-specified can therefore be compared not always 1:1 ...
