Frage von tom:
After many filmmakers it could hardly wait, delivers the Canon XH A1 finally s.Normalsterbliche from synonymous. We have the camcorder even closer views and marveled not bad ..
To test report
Antwort von Mr. Mister:
COOL PART! I am convinced, BUT: What is with compression artifacts? What in the A1?
CU,
SixFo
Antwort von Schmuck:
Only very briefly, because I still like to restore the various equipment needs ;-)
Absolutely agree! Have any other office in BetaSP Comparison of lags also.
What strikes me now in three weeks' notice is:
- The focus ring is nice, but getting used to, because sometimes you really need to screw from a nearby setting quickly to come to a distant
- In general it is difficult peak, despite the focus to be kept clean-synonymous because of the low traumhaft depth ;-)
- The images are generally great, the chromatic aberrations, I still have not adversely
- Standby good, fast s.and re-addition to very good battery life
- WB preset unfortunately just below the display - and the little button is hard to turn
- Eye cap is bad
- As I always do everything manual, the three rings are excellent haptic-I would like another AE button for a short exposure check
That's it, I did not regretted the purchase yet-nice WE.
LG, jewelry
--
Antwort von Axel:
Friends had the part for testing since yesterday. I must especially on a mistake of me in relation to the camera particularly interested: the "25f mode." Both in the article here as synonymous in
Antwort von ruessel:
Here is an original stream of A1 in 25F mode. For me bucking the vehicles, but I am not sure whether it s.Screen (LCD) or s.25F mode is.
http://www.fxsupport.de/15.html (bottom)
Antwort von Axel:
For me bucking the vehicles, but I am not sure whether it s.Screen (LCD) or s.25F mode is. I would ask what the closing time, we have used. One thinks not s.alles. If we have 1 / 25 have been used, which is according to this article through the bucking motion blur avoids, it would be a declaration. But I have the material here and do not see any of the DV in this long exposure time in the usual graffiti style image.
As soon as I know, I's post. At the moment I type in 1 / 50.
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
"traumhaft low depth ;-)"
What do you mean? Is it just 1/3-Chip like FX1?
Mipi
Antwort von Axel:
"traumhaft low depth ;-)"
What do you mean? Is it just 1/3-Chip like FX1? Yes, but instead of ~ 900,000 ~ 1,500,000 pixel. If the depth of field with the correct (could be) would be
Antwort von baristursun:
The Camera is great, just when I tested the Camera noticed that you are in something MF "veruscht" when the camera slightly in the hand.
Otherwise, the 25f mode is not the true, but what Slashcam at the XL-H1 has noted in the XH-A1 but somehow under the table returns.
The only interlaced CCDs are read out, then the internal progressive is to be expected. This can be good, but De-Interlace on the PC or Mac better.
These are the tapes recorded with 25f are incompatible with almost all the cutting systems and HDV -Recordern/Kameras.
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Axel:
Otherwise, the 25f mode is not the true, but what Slashcam at the XL-H1 has noted in the XH-A1 but somehow under the table returns.
The only interlaced CCDs are read out, then the internal progressive is to be expected. This can be good, but De-Interlace on the PC or Mac better. Capture preset "HDV," Timeline "25P" - Where there is still something to be deinterlaced? Deinterlacing 50i means of quality loss, even with a good, even at the best possible deinterlacer.
These are the tapes recorded with 25f are incompatible with almost all the cutting systems and HDV -Recordern/Kameras. Almost. What does that already.
Antwort von HeikoS:
It's about the signal processing before recording.
Grob said the Canon reads in 25f mode, not every line of the intake of chips, but only every 2nd, practically a half.
Antwort von Axel:
It's about the signal processing before recording.
Grob said the Canon reads in 25f mode, not every line of the intake of chips, but only every 2nd, practically a half. Heiko Salut,
so would the "f" is not an abbreviation for "Frame" to explain, but as an abbreviation for "Field". A brief account: A field in HDV has 540 vertical pixel resolution, and so we had to do it here.
It is not that this prinzipell not think I would be - each - for a link thankful that this kind of signal processing evidence.
25f Jerkiness that was so far of all claims. NA. That the material was largely incompatible, as well as non-existent: No with a hair instantly and in real time of my editing program accepts.
The Focus-no, the
resolution is more impressive than when I trusted FX1. The 1080 will of course be best, of progressive output devices (other we can think outside before I leave) to 540 - and hochskaliert deinterlaced 50p. Nevertheless, should this to 540 - 25p of AH1 an advantage.
So, dear Heiko if you betray me, where hast thou thy knowledge, it would be a particularly good product advice for me. I admit that so little about some technical background to know.
Antwort von Ré:
So if I understand correctly, the Canon is not true 25P? For me is about the correct mode to be found if in the end eineKinoauswertung the material is intended. (apart from to have a closing date on Celluloid pending, or a digital projection takes place). Is it not so that a 25P Picture Picture 50i then one would be preferable?
I doubt between the Canon A1, and the new SonyHVR V1: Sony Should probably true 25P recording, and that would be for a theatrical release better. Or how you see it?
Antwort von Axel:
So if I understand correctly, the Canon is not true 25P? The pictures are certainly progressive. To recognize that, if one still picture on the calculator einzoomt strong, no ridges are visible, as happens with interlaced images always is. What needs to be clarified here: Whether the Resolutiontatsächlich halved, as it is in simple yes synonymous deinterlaces do.
I doubt between the Canon A1, and the new SonyHVR V1: Sony Should probably true 25P recording, and that would be for a theatrical release better. Or how you see it? Full is full. When the V1 its 1,036,000 pixels actually in the full pack, it could be better for his Fazen. Then would be the advantage of the Canon with 1,560,000 pixels only an apparent, if it is synonymous around 1000 ¬ cheaper. When it comes to advertising, are all overkill-Resolutions. When it comes to movie goes, it can obviously never be enough. Whether it is three, five or ten years, is hard to tell, but someday there will be no analog in cinemas movie anymore. Even today, every large house at least a digital playback facility. The more modern of these systems can play all formats, and whether the material is interlaced or progressive, they (and the audience) is simply cold.
Antwort von Valentino:
The pictures are certainly progressive. The only true fact is crucial as the images are read out and because it is now in the Canon of the interline CCDs to image converter and this is always the picture interlaced readout. For CMOS imagers, there is this Porblem garnicht only because this is always progressive chips out.
This is, inter alia, that a parallel CMOS chip and a CCD-chip serial ausglesen will.
The ridges do not accept to be persuasive only to the De-Interlace has done good work, but not the images were synonymous Progressi out.
The best example of new DVD players and televisions (LCD / plasma) through a good De-Interlace even with a Picture of 1,36 m with no ridges show interlaced material.
Even today, every large house at least a digital playback facility. The more modern of these systems can play all formats, and whether the material is interlaced or progressive, they (and the audience) is simply cold.
This is synonymous not completely accurate, so in about 99 percent of all digtialen DLP Cinema projectors are installed in accordance with the digital cinema standard 24 or 48 frames per Seknunde reflect nothing else.
Quite apart from me is just a viewer familiar with the fields umfgehen can install it without de-interlace and the tubes are projectors.
Antwort von hyneck:
So the A1 material is progressive and in almost full resolution, the loss amounts to only 12%. For FX1 and Z1 are between 30 and 50% when the shutter at 1 / 25 represents.
Antwort von Valentino1:
Oh and how does the Lord or the Lady of these findings?
Antwort von Marco:
"Roughly speaking reading the Canon in the 25f mode, not every line of the intake of chips, but only every 2nd, practically a half." That is roughly synonymous words as incorrect. Also in 25F mode, every line-out, but then a kind deinterlaces downstream, but deinterlacing that is not precisely described by a simple Zeilendopplung produced. How exactly that works with Canon, is a trade secret. Functioning does it well. Even better than many software deinterlacer would make.
Marco
Antwort von hyneck:
Man how could I forget the link to post. There are only 10.6% loss.
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost.php?p=579582&postcount=17
Antwort von Axel:
... So in about 99 percent of all digtialen DLP Cinema projectors are installed in accordance with the digital cinema standard 24 or 48 frames per Seknunde reflect nothing else.
Quite apart from me is just a viewer familiar with the fields umfgehen can install it without de-interlace and the tubes are projectors. The DLP-header itself is only by the size of the chips handicapped which, before about 6 years, 1k, 2k is today. The digital server in turn is of the size and speed of its raid of the system and software Requirements handicapped, but is constantly expanding, currently, for example through the memory-hungry JPEG2000. The latest solution - is synonymous to most expensive and therefore are still relatively rare - is to use a Scalers, with all the lower resolutions and important, aspect ratios, can be represented. The refresh rate has nothing to do.
It is true that the display is progressive, ultimately, I just wanted to "Ré" show that in this digital projection as well as little interest on a good plasma. Resolutiondes The image here is the crucial factor.
Myself, we are not about movies, but compositing, what with progressive material is simply better.
The link of "guest" on only 10% resolution loss is for me without further explanation does not quite understand, it's missing the connection. In other statements, which support this claim or refute this, I am very curious.
Antwort von hyneck:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=80254 This is now again the entire thread. I hope this helps.
Antwort von hyneck:
When it comes to advertising, are all overkill-Resolutions. On the contrary. For movie advertising is a lot more effort than for feature films.
Antwort von HeikoS:
@ Marco:
And what sense does it all the lines read out, and according to deinterlace? But only if the line is not at the same time read out.
It is here the question whether a genuine Canon makes progressive recording, so really all rows at the same time be exposed, or if only every 2nd Line at the same time is exposed. And this is why Canon does not hold the whole 25p.
How strong is now vertical resolution of the loss felt, I can say nothing. in comparison to a Sony Or HVX200 must, however, synonymous in mind that the number of pixels of the Canon is much higher.
Nevertheless, it seems so loud Dv-info link so better to drive, recorded in 25f, as in retrospect to deinterlace. and ultimately this is about the question.
Antwort von Axel:
On the contrary. For movie advertising is a lot more effort than for feature films. But not with prosumer cams. I went here selbstredend of regional advertising, not from the new Coca-Cola spot.
Antwort von HeikoS:
It should read: But only if the line is not at the same time be exposed.
Antwort von Marco:
"And what sense does it all the lines read out, and according to deinterlace? But only if the line is not at the same time read out." Yes, just as it is synonymous.
"It is here the question whether a genuine Canon makes progressive recording," There are two things confused thrown. Once the progressive recording - which makes the A1 well. And secondly, the progressive reading of the chip - that's NOT the A1.
The chip will NOT be progressively extracted. But the signal that a THEREAFTER deinterlaces undergone, is - what are the technical characteristics - as a progressive signal recorded on tape. The latter is synonymous probably the reason that some NLE editing systems that signal, which is now finally recorded as 25p (not ausgetastet) was not able to interpret, because in HDV2 standard, there is no 1080/25p. Cutting programs, which clearly come synonymous show 25p in there.
So: Progressive Chipaustastung: No. Volume Progressive Recording: Yes. Between them lies the deinterlacing.
"And this is why Canon does not hold the whole 25p." Canon calls it is not 25p, just because the chip is not out progressively. That is ultimately synonymous Picture in a slight difference to a truly progressive selected signal. It has its own advantages and disadvantages.
That is when the A1 is not unlike all previous models of SD with Canon Frame mode. Is synonymous with my XL-1 is not different.
Marco
Antwort von HeikoS:
Canon calls it is not 25p, just because the chip is not out progressively. That is ultimately synonymous Picture in a slight difference to a truly progressive selected signal. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. What advantages does it?
Antwort von Axel:
I would ask what the closing time, we have used. One thinks not s.alles. If we have 1 / 25 have been used, which is according to this article through the bucking motion blur avoids, it would be a declaration. But I have the material here and do not see any of the DV in this long exposure time in the usual graffiti style image.
As soon as I know, I's post. At the moment I type in 1 / 50. It
was 1/50tel. Similar statements ( "jerky but") one hears again and again about the progressive mode of DVX 100th In order to avoid confusion: The movement resolution of 25 phases compared with 50 stages
is poor, fast Bewegungn effect is not as smooth. From a
Jerkiness can only speak my opinion, if the effect a one-step forward two steps back-equivalent, so if you wrote the 25p material is Halbbildpräferenz assigns. I do not know whether the jerky 25f - Movies synonymous have correctly interpreted, or interpret
could. As top Marco writes, 1080p is not standard equipment in cutting programs ...
Antwort von Marco:
"What advantages does it?" Movements seem a little liquid than real progressive Chipaustastung.
Marco
Antwort von HeikoS:
@ Marco:
Like this? That would be only the case if Fieldblending would use, the internal deinterlacer So the Movement Phase of the 2nd half image in any form of weight added to the 1st half. What then increased again after Bewegungsverschleifung itself.
Antwort von Marco:
Correct. Although it is not necessarily a field-blending required. There are many types of deinterlacing. The fact of the relatively low resolution of the loss-frame mode to the interlaced mode confirms that there is quite a high deinterlacer is used. And as far as I frame by the mode of my XL-1 can say losses are in fact s.ehesten in the movement areas to bear. And there they disturb synonymous simultaneously s.wenigsten if you do not just make a single image viewing.
Marco
Antwort von Axel:
What then increased again after Bewegungsverschleifung itself. This is probably so. As a clear advantage, I would not sell. What are the adverse effects of aesthetics in certain situations - or always - occur, would have only a direct comparison p versus f show. I would suspect that, as a tiny advantage, at least any Jerkiness by a lack of intermediate stages is lower.
Antwort von HeikoS:
From a Jerkiness can only speak my opinion, if the effect a one-step forward two-steps-back equal to Thou art indeed synonymous here (if not so obviously synonymous extreme, as in a swap of Halbbildreihenfolge). Because the visual system "is" movement. If, however, as with a 25p Recording on the moving object apparently not continuously, but step of changing its position, it comes before the viewer, as it would jump out and back. This effect is of course subject and falls depending s.stärksten, if a surface hartumrissene contrast (eg dark stairway railing against a light background) in a not too fast, not too slow speed (eg camera-turn) in the picture moves.
The effect is called in English "Strobing".
Film-makers are aware of this limitation and therefore hold certain swing speeds. The networks can be synonymous as a rotary table on which you can read, in which focal how quickly you can pan.
Antwort von HeikoS:
Hmm, there `s not even here NEN other thread in which exactly the opposite has been alleged? Namely, that the Canons Jerkiness more than others?
Personally, I say a little softer, but also smoother recording more. In so far, it would be quite good, so if Canon would have implemented.
Antwort von Marco:
It seems to me that if in all the forums again and again of "bucking" is spoken, this is a very subjective impression, which also never standardized conditions mentioned.
The sensation of the shakes is not only of the movement speed and movement-dependent, but also synonymous of contrasts, from the monitor, of the used shutter speed, etc.
Have people already on the 25p-bucking violently complain belongs, in the way: "Something like, I can not ever see." For those times then a DVD commentary with 25p material (the XL-1), where they apparently nothing had disturbed s.Picture impression. Conversely, I see myself whose 50i material, where the automatic exposure-free game and had the exposure time is obviously somewhere beyond the 1 / 250 sec was and where I very clearly a discernible shutter was (precisely because of the short exposure time).
So if someone bucking of 25F-material criticized, what exactly does he do? When shooting with the shutter speed? For any kind of movement? At what speed? Which picture content? On what type of monitor, with the Hz value?
I go well for years with both the 25F mode, the XL-1, as synonymous with subsequent deinterlacing, as synonymous with true progressive 25p material of PD-1. Of course, the Picture impression, due to the synonymous something other processing of motion, other than 50i. This must then be precisely targeted manner, as is the desired dramatic s.ehesten serve. I assume 50i, now 50p, sometimes 25p/25F.
Marco
Antwort von HeikoS:
404ERR
Antwort von Marco:
I would still need to complete above: As far as my own experience is concerned, I am always on 1 / 50 sec exposure time.
Others I do not use, or in a few exceptional cases, only when I changed with the exposure time is a very specific effect, or would like to achieve for a very specific kind of post a better base to have.
"Moreover, it acts" artful "less real" Yes, I see it as synonymous.
Marco
Antwort von Ré:
[quote = "Marco"] [
movements seem a little liquid than real progressive chipaustastung.
marco [/ quote]
So would a 25F system perhaps prefer to have a 25P (as well as SonyV1) when it comes to Kinoausbelichtung going? Who would already have a more fluid movement refuse ...?
What if the material man on a normal television (ie tube monitor) would watch? Does my ignorance, but the abundance s.tech details haute wanted me to ... 'dooferweise' only know whether I am better to use a XH A1 or V1 buy ....
Or perhaps I should define the question the other way: there are situations where the camera clearly would be preferable to others?
Computer Video reported more negative of the V1, another swarm of them ..... dilemma dilemma ;-)
Ré
Antwort von Axel:
... dilemma dilemma ... Although many I am a Sony customer, I expect of the V1 no quality improvement over the A1, and certainly none that justifies the price difference.
As is the Canon Consumercam in handling almost too complicated. No Cam under the motto: shoot you, we'll take care of the rest
It should be borne in mind.
But it seems you do not relate to. Would it be unforgivably curious, wanting to know what kind fazen movie you want to leave?
Antwort von Axel:
The fact is what we call "cinematic movement representation" means, is actually a shortcoming of the film, just so you asoziiert superior images, it also affects "artful" less real Insufficient is the image frequency of 24 B / s (if they are synonymous in the movies by a trick to cover 48 or even 72 B / s is pushed), but not the principle fullscreen. I think that a presentation with 50p or 60p s.besten would. The desire to make a "film look" to achieve, is not only the desire to "inadequate" movie images to imitate, but imho more a rejection of the clinical, dead video images. Video images do not oscillate, like everything around us, they are technically perfect. We are frightened as amateurs, if we take our surroundings for the first time in the video, and we hope that we will not Aufzeichnungsart Continuous sometime by viewing (visual resignation) to keep the reality.
Antwort von HeikoS:
I think that a presentation with 50p or 60p s.besten would. Of course.
However, you will ensure that the cinematic movement synonymous lose representation. You then return to normal 50i look.
Video images do not oscillate, like everything around us, they are completely technically I do not understand.
Antwort von Axel:
However, you will ensure that the cinematic movement synonymous lose representation. You then return to normal 50i look. As you yourself write, is the movement representation in the movies
actually a shortcoming (last row). And at a higher frame rate does
not look interlaced, see
IMAX HD
IMAX HD
IMAX HD
IMAX HD
Antwort von HeikoS:
the interlace technique (which in all its progressive output devices look for happiness loses) mimics the signal processing is not our Sehapparates after the excitation of sensory cells (rods and suppositories, whose condition is an electrochemical reaction changes and the need to stage a recovery) and the processing of a series of "frames" through the Sehzentrum, unlike zeilenförmig interwoven fields. Have you given any scientific source on this?
I can see no difference between a interlaceaufnahme, which I consider a tube TV and a plasma consisting of the 50i 50p charged. (except that the deinterlacer sometimes wrong, and the 25p mode returns)
Should it really be that the Halbbildstruktur for another sense impression would be responsible, then yes this would be increasing with changing viewing distance. Because s.einem certain distance, it is simply physically impossible to Zeile1 of line2 to distinguish (keyword: resolution limit of the eye)
And what are the rows of the image-building is concerned, the change is not synonymous yes, if I interlace or progressive record. That would mean that a feature film on a tube device creates a different perception than on an LCD / Plasma.
Antwort von Axel:
Have you given any scientific source on this? Not off the cuff, but the reverse is conclusive enough. Starting with a refresh rate of about 12 B / s images, we can not know more than individual images, rather than jerky motion. On the inertia of our retina, the film based technology. Therefore, the signal processing in the brain is not a continuous present, but a progressive "frame refreshing." The - by the "frame rate" more or less fluid motion will give us a sense impression from the short-term memory presents (quasi Behind Volume control, which explains the synonymous Effect of déjà vu at exhaustion, the perception is the downstream signal processing).
I myself had perhaps a carrier retina than thou, I like to sit in the front rows (advantage: I can even adjust the sharpness to date, since I'm the presenter). That in turn reminds me of a native "i" Picture, for example a television image on a tube, to immediately uncomfortable.
Antwort von Axel:
EDIT: All this is very off-topic. To the matter to the point to bring:
25p movement has a worse resolution, but "beautiful" pictures (how should I say the more accurate?).
50i has the same equipment Resolutionauf progressive movement for better representation, but a
somewhat vague impression Picture (fuzzy wording, I know).
50p would be the same resolution in direct comparison ANY spontaneously for Best Picture hold.
Can we agree?
Antwort von Marco:
So I would like synonymous, at least for me personally formulated. I would just maybe "Best Picture" against "the s.natürlichsten acting Picture replace. Because good is what you want and supports the dramaturgy may well be synonymous 25p.
Marco
Antwort von Ré:
[quote = "Axel"] [the request, a "film look" to achieve, is not only the desire to "inadequate" to imitate the cinematic images, but imho more a rejection of the clinical, dead video bilder.
I mean exactly synonymous, and perhaps it is finally s.meisten in this topic. @ axel: I want a short-feature fazen, we have time and knowledge, but not the budget to go directly to 35mm to HDV drehen.also it had to be, and therefore the question: s.oder canon sony v1. the actors are often deeper perspektive rotated, so much in the air and cloudless ed. solll is also partly to a documenta entrepreneurial feel, where people on the street and glass facades before moving (much synonymous in the crystal air & wolken).
(the operation complexity is not an issue for me).
the cmos sensors may well have a greater contrast range than CCDs deliver, I find that interesting in comparison to the canon a1. it is not only halt 25p or 50i which imho the clinical picture produced video, but synonymous in the ausgefressenen highlights video bilder. I would not always stop a person in the landscape a 4kW hmi-par on the face thunder ;-)
since both cameras can not 50p, do I have to decide zw 25p and 25f. the whole is probably still in theaters synonymous with [u] digital [/ u] projectors are presented. Our CG-kollege think if I had the choice, not P or P-turn, says he turned P! This helps the Komputernachbearbeitung (2D & 3D Graphics). He would ask me: is this a kind of 25F synonymous P, or not, and it cost somewhere in optical quality or not.
Sorry for this long orieren, well, I did stop a lot of experience with S16mm, but not with HDV ;-)
Ré
Antwort von Marco:
"He would ask me: is this a kind of 25F synonymous P, or not, and it cost somewhere in optical quality or not." The final one-25F mode, as he ultimately lands on tape, is "a kind of P". The tape is a fullscreen without Halbbildstreifen what scanning and postprocessing perfectly can be advantageous. Only the way to the recorded signal is different in comparison to a "P-format". In motion it cost optical quality, but in the overall context is to be assessed. Indeed, since this kind of loss vseine movement is softer, it is not necessarily bad.
Marco
Antwort von kleines:
enough for such a project have a camera?
gruß cj
Antwort von kleines:
Will say that the interlace technology (which in all its progressive output devices look for happiness loses) mimics the signal processing is not our Sehapparates after the excitation of sensory cells (rods and suppositories, whose condition is an electrochemical reaction changes and the recovery phase need) and the processing of a series of "frames" through the Sehzentrum, unlike zeilenförmig interwoven fields. That would mean that the eye would have a shutter, since the suppository and chopsticks at the same time, all their non-active state achieved both synonymous and again sent a signal. I remember from biology class, for example, the cells helligkeitsempfindlichen a shorter regeneration need than the color. The brain receives full, there may not be correct. There are continuous signals, and therefore the perception is synonymous continuously and in real time.
Antwort von Herr_Weissensteiner:
Time back relating to:
Does the A1 the images in a configurable interval record?
LG Daniel
Antwort von strohy:
Here you have an example video I've made New Year's Eve
http://www.4creations.de/apd/temp/gethappytest.wmv
Greeting strohy
Antwort von Axel:
Here you have an example video I've made New Year's Eve. Salut strohy.
Thanks for the video. Where are the 50 fps, after the camera but this option does not have?
In addition, the stream is extremely jerky for me (Mac), without bucking, I could only see him after I was H.264 with the same stats had converted. This is not the first WMV 9 HD, but for the first time with bucking. Is it cross-platform problem or perhaps have some Windows users the same?
Antwort von Gast1:
In addition, the stream is extremely jerky for me (Mac), without bucking, I could only see him after I was H.264 with the same stats had converted. This is not the first WMV 9 HD, but for the first time with bucking. Is it cross-platform problem or perhaps have some Windows users the same? Yes, runs like a poorly made Diasschau.
Antwort von Axel:
Will say that the interlace technology (which in all its progressive output devices look for happiness loses) mimics the signal processing is not our Sehapparates after the excitation of sensory cells (rods and suppositories, whose condition is an electrochemical reaction changes and the recovery phase need) and the processing of a series of "frames" through the Sehzentrum, unlike zeilenförmig interwoven fields.
That would mean that the eye would have a shutter, since the suppository and chopsticks at the same time, all their non-active state achieved both synonymous and again sent a signal. I remember from biology class, for example, the cells helligkeitsempfindlichen a shorter regeneration need than the color. The brain receives full, there may not be correct. There are continuous signals, and therefore the perception is synonymous continuously and in real time. Your perception is "continuously and in real-time"? Then, I congratulate you, X-Man, because you're probably the first of a new breed Mutant. We
can unfortunately a rapid sequence of frames as the only movement seen. Hopefully it will not be rendered sometime s.Schluß of the film as the
man with the X-ray eyes ...
Antwort von Chris182:
In addition, the stream is extremely jerky for me (Mac), without bucking, I could only see him after I was H.264 with the same stats had converted. This is not the first WMV 9 HD, but for the first time with bucking. Is it cross-platform problem or perhaps have some Windows users the same?
Yes, runs like a poorly made Diasschau. I did it with Aspect HD and then recorded with the standard Premiere Pro2 WMV Export Settings (But As elements of line, as it is for PC presentation was intended)
On my Athlon64 3800 +, 2 GB HD, and 7200 RPM hard drive is running the video somewhat redundant. In between, I have synonymous Ruckler.
Do you have alternative recommendations export? Then I invite you again as high.
Antwort von PowerMac:
In addition, the stream is extremely jerky for me (Mac), without bucking, I could only see him after I was H.264 with the same stats had converted. This is not the first WMV 9 HD, but for the first time with bucking. Is it cross-platform problem or perhaps have some Windows users the same?
Yes, runs like a poorly made Diasschau.
I did it with Aspect HD and then recorded with the standard Premiere Pro2 WMV Export Settings (But As elements of line, as it is for PC presentation was intended)
On my Athlon64 3800 +, 2 GB HD, and 7200 RPM hard drive is running the video somewhat redundant. In between, I have synonymous Ruckler.
Do you have alternative recommendations export? Then I invite you again as high. Quicktime: H.264
BTW is the synonymous with me how rocky shit. Something I had never been. And my processor is fast!
Antwort von the machine:
So for me the clip runs flawlessly, it is probably s.eurem Processor. I NEN Core 2 Extreme ...
Antwort von strohy:
I now have a video with X.264 Encodes times.
schaut mal, whether the better running:
www.4cg.de/temp/aegyptentest.avi
Antwort von Axel:
I now have a video with X.264 Encodes times.
schaut mal, whether the better running:
www.4cg.de/temp/aegyptentest.avi Well, I have X.264 and synonymous, since about fourteen days, perian, all AVI files should play, and it does seem synonymous - up to this. It comes only in QT Player Music (Alexander or The Iceland?) Generally, I Avis, if Quicktime zickte, earlier with the VLC player. The only synonymous but plays music - and here is extremely distorted. No wonder, the secured file is synonymous only 2.3 MB.
Schade.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Actually, there are 28.5 MB and with the MPlayer and perian (s.and s.aktualisieren ...) is.
The Quicktime Player 7.1.3 crashes when ever, if I try to play this file. Also the Finder, if I file it in the preview try;)
Antwort von Axel:
Actually, there are 28.5 MB and with the MPlayer and perian (s.and s.aktualisieren ...) is.
The Quicktime Player 7.1.3 crashes when ever, if I try to play this file. Also the Finder, if I file it in the preview try;) Okay, after I download the whole file synonymous, the QT Player crashes after display of the boot image. As you've suggested, I have the MPlayer (# OSX2) installed, but it also plays only the music.
I could see the movie now, probably in a reduced quality that I opened with QT, but not play, but now have to export as mov, the sound is not, however, the same frequency completely distorted. Is not the meaning of things as well.
* MPlayer
and perian *, you wrote, but how should they work together (as the latest perian QT component, MPlayer as Unix File)? Thank you in advance for the tips.
Antwort von PowerMac:
No, perian and MPlayer are both yes. With my (Intel-) MPlayer is. I think you just need a newer version of Universal. Expect you of the video but not much. Still slightly jerky. And not just the best shots. No idea what this is 50p ... And no idea why it was so weird encoded.
Antwort von Peter Storm:
I am now the proud owner of a synonymous XH A1. For me it jerky on the monitor synonymous violently. But the television image shows that this is only the inertia of my PC is flat panel. He is quite big and was previously regarded as the exclusive criterion for photo editing and color resolution, but never speed of presentation.
Antwort von Axel:
I am now the proud owner of a synonymous XH A1. For me it jerky on the monitor synonymous violently. But the television image shows that this is only the inertia of my PC is flat panel. He is quite big and was previously regarded as the exclusive criterion for photo editing and color resolution, but never speed of presentation. For "bucking" in case there are two variants of the A1:
1. The Picture is only normal, after a few seconds then it will hang eventually runs back a bit and next will asynchronously.
Reason: Processor to paralyze and / or too little RAM.
2. All
movements are unnatural leaps (Treppab on a sled), normal subjects during quiet look.
Reason: The Camera in "25F" mode. The editing program dominated this mode does not always. You can find out by using the timeline after a HDV1080
p-25 setting studied.
The default setting for HDV is 1080
i. Exports with this attitude leads to a wrong interpretation of the material: The original fields are simultaneously recorded in 50 stages instead of only in 25th
Antwort von saob:
hello together,
I would like to soon, after a long time ago that synonymous a Canon xh s.zulegen,
has anyone tips where you can buy the s.bessten (near cologne)?
is from the sale of used equipment discouraged?
grüße bs
