Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Test: Test: Panasonic AG-AF101 of rob - February 11, 2011 14:00:00 > With the Panasonic AG-AF101 is heralded in the camcorder area of a new era. For the first time combines an HD camcorder, the benefits of a "film look-sensor" which previously only available for video DSLRs with the capabilities of a professional HD camcorder (XLR inputs, HD SDI Out, ND filters, was peaking, etc. ). We have carried out the Panasonic AG-101 AF a test with different lenses (ussynonymous high-quality Leica-M lenses) ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
Boh, is located below the resolution GH2, I'm laughing now, really limp, no, I did not. tonight is the same time the GH2 stroked.
Antwort von deti:
@ SlashCAM: If you would still test the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2, then I would be very grateful!
Deti
Antwort von toxitobi:
Does the slow motion for 1080? Is it then possible, as 1080/50bzw 60p some time ago read somewhere or not?
and is taken during these still sound?
Greeting Toxitobi
Antwort von r.p.television:
That in contrast to nearly 5000 ¬ cheaper (!) GH2 stronger scaling artifacts and an overall lower resolution accrue is actually pretty embarrassing.
If that cranking not as attractive, this camera next XLR, ND and HD-SDI would have no value, and even the HD-SDI with 8-bit 422 does not offer the optimum.
Also very disappointing: only the GH2 has the digital zoom mode, which offers an on-site but a lot of flexibility in the Focal. And the viewfinder is synonymous with the GH2 better. Hello?
But watching something Canon offers this year. Either a 5D Mark II (with hopefully a better video image) or a successor with L-EOS Mount and APS-C. Or maybe the Sony version is still coming - although I expect there actually s.wenigsten.
Until then, perhaps a GH2 and EOS adapter.
If the 101 does not have this tasty Overcranking in 1080p ... pondering ... pondering ....
EDIT: Oh yes. This price would have been but AVCIntra 100 or so a format such as the Canon 422 8bit 50Mbit expect. At least something with 422nd The awkward work with external recorders, I do not like, especially since I do not even know if work on any interface when cranking 60p at 1080p, or whether the recorder can.
Antwort von -paleface-:
What does that really you in your night shot "shutter off"?
Is it synonymous turn without stutter?
So for the price was the cost part. Did I get this rig still nen ne LED light, 2 Tripods and ne rail. Money, and had then left.
Will first moire and Rolling Shutter comparisons look here to tell you to "a change would do me good."
Whereas I would see as more synonymous to the moire. Rolling Shutter problems I had with my projects so far, almost never. And if so little that it eh no notice.
If the moire is already something else. If one chooses as de wrong clothes for a protagonist, you have to fight something. But there can be synonymous with a few filters the results (at least in part) back a little rescue.
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
I was one who has quite a long grumbled about the workflow with HDSLRs and was waiting for just such a camera of Pana.
A worthy successor to the HVX-honored.
Only I'm in the waiting time to try to ne bought 550 and screwed my old Niko shards of it.
Change of course nothing on "Tonproblem.
But: If I want to deal with the AF101 like the HVX, I need a rig.
While onboard have XLR, but her handling of the bare AF101 not be kept as light as ne HDSLR, yet it is so good in the hand as ne HVX (at least for me ...).
But if I need a rig, I can strap on it as synonymous ne 550D and NEN Tascam / Zoom - and am still a quarter of the cost.
So my new Dilema: Now there are ne Pana as I (about) wanted, but I can not justify the additional cost compared to existing nerve HDSLR somehow, because I think the Pana does not offer sufficient added value.
Honestly, I'd rather be in 10000 + NEN HPX370 successor invest with greater chip, good zoom and AVCHD100.
Antwort von stonee:
Hi,
I hope that this is now not too off-topic is:
Why the 35mm cameras (Red, Alexa, AF101, SonyF35 ...) only an image sensor?
Each camera so far for good image quality was (no preference whether or thick Henkelmann Ikegami) is a 3 image sensors. For each primary color one.
Have I missed a fundamental new research or new development? Why SD 720x576 with an image chip per'se was "rubbish" and suddenly it goes out for HD?
I suspect that much space is wasted on the 35 mm chip filter. Although you can then reduce the depth of field because the next pixel from each distributed but signal to noise ratio and sensitivity, dynamic range (Aperture), and so can not win it.
Due to the mechanical and optical expenses primarily synonymous is very likely that the Manufacturer now flooding the market with first 1Chip 35mm cams. Then as soon as the market is saturated in 2014, there are suddenly a "unforeseen" 3Chip hype with 3Chip-Red, Alexa & Co. The current cameras are then ready for the bin before they are written ...
What do you think?
Best regards,
stonee
Ps: Against the Panasonic AG-AF101 I have nothing. The likes of me and the data from the test very well.
I have synonymous nothing against large image sensors, I just wonder whether this is now like cameras pure marketing: "Selling Handy digital camera with 50 megapixels, excellent pictures, but only when the sun is at 12 s.höchsten stands and a powerful external flash used to be "...
Antwort von rob:
hello paleface,
shutter off means that the camera selects the default format for standard-shutter:
are in the 101 at both the
1080 50i as synonymous at 1080 24p 1 / 50
different shutter speeds are selected individually, of course ...
Regards
rob
Antwort von ruessel:
1080 50i as synonymous at 1080 24p 1 / 50 Safe?
I type "shutter off" on to:
50i = 1 / 50
25p = 1 / 25
24p = 1 / 24
Antwort von domain:
Why the 35mm cameras (Red, Alexa, AF101, SonyF35 ...) only an image sensor?
Each camera so far for good image quality was (no preference whether or thick Henkelmann Ikegami) is a 3 image sensors. For each primary color one.
I think that one can assume that three image sensors pretty soon perfect for all cameras will be out. Or do you know any high quality DSLR (even in the medium format sector) is still working with the beam splitters?
It is simply not necessary if the primary number of pixels and the subsequent imaging algorithms are present.
Antwort von Harald_123:
I think that one can assume that three image sensors pretty soon perfect for all cameras will be out. Or do you know any high quality DSLR (even in the medium format sector) is still working with the beam splitters? This is probably even more in the future. In the way the Foveon "3in1" sensor.
A recent Sony patent application to:
Antwort von meawk:
What I have already expressed yesterday before the test?
Yes - expensive toy for amateurs -
with insufficient max. 24 MBit AVCHD codec to lower Resolutionetc. But with a few professional features. Only if you record external, it is "a weng" is better. . .
Do not buy!
There is indeed a GH2, if there is one Pana must be better. A GH13 is even better. All right?
I'm always surprised how one or the other Pre Production Tester these cams may miss a good note: OK, all of which are somehow paid of Pana. . .
In this respect, thank s.den Test of Slashcam - your test but absolutely neutral and generally called a spade a spade (as already in GH1 MJPEG in terms of time, while Philip Bloom had praised the very mode ???)....
LG
Antwort von rob:
1080 50i as synonymous at 1080 24p 1 / 50
Safe?
I type "shutter off" on to:
50i = 1 / 50
25p = 1 / 25
24p = 1 / 24 Hi Russel,
we had originally thought synonymous, but the manual says something different from (Vol II, p. 15).
Regards
rob
Antwort von ruessel:
Hi Russel,
we had originally thought synonymous, but the manual says something different from (Vol II, p. 15). then the image chip is not read very unusual? Can he perhaps only i and all p are calculated only artificial?
Antwort von Funque:
in the price range would then probably soon to settle the RED Scarlet, which is so modular and so to the top of the price is still quite open, depending on what one wants or can afford s.Ausstattung.
But according to RED Epic and the first is yes then the Scarlet so which one to probably still can not really say.
Or I squander me now by the way and try to compare apples with pears?
Best regards
Antwort von meawk:
in the price range would then probably soon to settle the RED Scarlet. . . Very nice, but what do you say to us? If you're of the opinion that a RED Scarlet (film done) get for this price, you're on the wrong track. Whether a Scarlet ever comes, is synonymous questionable. But is great, you always have to wait for a reason and nothing to buy - because they are waiting for the Scarlet. . . Somehow coooool!
Antwort von WoWu:
Only RED is so synonymous s.der Physics indispensable.
And to establish large sensors, the small resolution always means either low-pass filter is well below the Nyquist frequency, with the corresponding blur, or even Alias | Wavefront Mayaing.
And RED is as synonymous change nothing in it.
Now DSRL chose Aiasing because they still synonymous to take pictures and the AF100 just a fuzzy picture, because the large discrepancy between the two frequencies is needed, just use it according to early.
It must now time that the two frequencies of the sensor and the lens must be coordinated.
So 2 / 3 "with the right HD Lens and the issue is over yet.
Until then, have been synonymous then the entire (anti) Focus Group totgespielt and decent pictures are back in fashion.
s.dann I wait the HPX 300 successor remains synonymous and 10-bit AVC-I.
Antwort von meawk:
Only RED is so synonymous s.der Physics indispensable.
And to establish large sensors, the small resolution always means either low-pass filter is well below the Nyquist frequency, with the corresponding blur, or even Alias | Wavefront Mayaing.
And RED is as synonymous change nothing in it.
. . .
Until then, have been synonymous then the entire (anti) Focus Group totgespielt and decent pictures are back in fashion.
s.dann I wait the HPX 300 successor remains synonymous and 10-bit AVC-I. Give you right - so isses times now. Synonymous not generally claim that the full-frame sensor, etc. here is a king solution. One needs two good cams: one for the ultimate DOF and one for the rest. . .
The with the "only" depth of field is so synonymous slowly cave boring.
Antwort von WoWu:
Trouble is, we will use both the cams in a production that the images are not to be matches.
Have we tried ... grottenschlecht.
