Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Test: Test: Panasonic HDC-TM900 (HDC-SD909 and HDC bauähnlich-HS900) of rudi - February 8, 2011 15:39:00 > Really large differences from the previous models does not offer the 900 series. But for a few details we are still words in our test of the brand-new top-Panasonic camcorder ...
Antwort von Replay:
Unlike the JVC GZ-HM550 HM1 is sharpened or indeed on the Pana clearly visible, just as synonymous with the 2010s Panas. To my mind see the JVC is a natural focus (but for this to flash colors) on artificially sharpens the Panas I feel in the work setting.
The artificial field can park at the Panas but (focus in the basic settings to -1 or -2). And leave the slope, are blue to turquoise (2010s and earlier models), you can mitigate with WB shift at least. In the default setting of blue sky is actually very fast turquoise, as well as actually tend blue traffic signs or other full blue items on the video then to turquoise.
Antwort von Frank B.:
In the default setting of blue sky is actually very fast turquoise, as well as actually tend blue traffic signs or other full blue items on the video then to turquoise. The fact that the after at least 3 - 4 camera generations have still not come to grips ...
That can not be that hard to get this annoying problem in the world. Apparently, after the 300 generation did not have much down to 50p s.den inner values.
Antwort von Replay:
My statement with the turquoise was based on the 2010 model, which with the sharpening of the 900. I changed my first post accordingly. A 2011er Pana I had not yet in hand, because I'm interested in the new Sony's much more (some completely new hardware and firmware).
I'm curious if the with the turquoise in the default settings for the 2011er Panas is still a problem.
It was already known in advance that the 2011er Panas on existing hardware (intestines) are based and have only missed a more recent firmware. It includes some changes in the handling (see article) flowed over and otherwise of the 750 (better lowlight, based on better noise suppression).
Antwort von motiongroup:
What to x models even more incredible sounds, the fact is that they obstruct still a fan.
Antwort von Frank B.:
... The fact that they obstruct still a fan. This took me a long time about the purchase of the SD 300 can reflect.
I've bought one yet then. The fan is not noticeable to me. I'm not synonymous sure I would notice if he fails. I do not think there would blow something.
Despite a few little quirks have not a bad camera.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... What to x models even more incredible sounds, the fact is that they obstruct still a fan ... At the latest it can be well conclude that the fan is not an ornament, but has its technical base, as a joke and not a Manufacturer romp down a bit, which is not to be. Since the problems encountered with some SD707 in 5.1 mode Tonproblem but since summer 2010, the table is (modification in the production of new equipment and update the service center for shipped cameras), should the 2011er-Models of the start no longer an issue be.
Antwort von Replay:
The Panas are so large that 3MOS system. CMOS / MOS sensors are significantly more efficient than CCDs, and are thus not so warm. But 3MOS in such a small enclosure in conjunction with faster (has 1080p50 synonymous s.einen DSP juicy claims) hardware certainly generate some heat. And that has to be done in the case.
In case of failure of the fan the camera will adjust the service, since the electronic notice that the fan is off. If you zuklebt the fan (someone has not), the camera will not go into, but it may be that increases due to the higher temperature of the sensors, the noise.
The simplest and most sensible way synonymous, which may (but should be no problem) to bypass the fan noise is audible recordings, change the position of the microphone to stereo. 5.1 Sound of a well-stamp-sized Micro is a dubious thing anyway.
If the camera otherwise appeals, the fan should be no argument against the camera.
