Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Test: Panasonics AG-HPX300 in Africa of Barry Green of rob - 12 Feb 2009 10:18:00 Barry Green of DVXUser.com, long-Afficionado Panasonic, had the opportunity to new Panasonics AG-HPX300 at length at a Wildlife Safari in Africa to be tested. The result is an interesting review of the new Pana in Comparison to the HPX170 and SonyEX1 / 3 positions. Sample clips are also available to see (however h264 compressed).
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
Why should I look at this device for 10.000,00 Euro to buy if I SonyEX1 for half price and get even greater depths with (un) focus?
The trend is clear - finally - to Full-chips and not back to 1 / 3
Antwort von Jogi:
... I see as synonymous. If you schom Full CMOS chips
The picture quality is comparable synonymous with the EX1 / 3 But the AVC Intra codec is postponed, the better.
Antwort von EEG:
... I see as synonymous. If you schom Full CMOS chips
The picture quality is comparable synonymous with the EX1 / 3 But the AVC Intra codec is postponed, the better. The HPX300 is synonymous with 1 / 3 "chips, therefore, not be confused with the HPX 3000
Antwort von Jogi:
... is already clear to me that they are only 1 / 3 "equipment.
Antwort von WoWu:
The trend is clear - finally - to Full-chip What is the advantage for when chips with 5600 pixels horizontally and 4000 pixels vertically almost back to 1920 x 1080 interpolien must (no binning) and the pixel size only so big, that when visors, you need to the low unutterable depth to compensate yet again by the diffraction blur gets.
Appropriately large pixel pitch is the secret and a sensor size, the 35mm film, which is half Full. That's all, but is Full of video is not really the ideal format.
Antwort von domain:
That would be and is synonymous for the Amateur Division: 13.5 * 24 mm, ie approximately 1.7 inches MOS-(Non-RS) sensor with 2.1 million pixels and min. Beginning of adjustable focal length and principal functions over rings, switches and wheels with at least H.264 AVC codec or XDCAM EX.
Increases to the top open to professionals.
But we will not experience as fast, too expensive and too little outlets.
Basically it would be for viewers of amateur films synonymous but not so important. Hardly believe that anyone ever of where a difference between 422 including 100 mbs AVC-I at all without a direct comparison to the inferior formats could recognize.
Because the content plays a much larger role than the quality s.sich what the insiders with their incredibly sharpened senses is so important.
Antwort von WoWu:
Jau, domain that's about it ... I would as synonymous in the professional sector did not increase for existing HD format to see more.
Basically it would be for viewers of amateur films synonymous but not so important. Hardly believe that anyone ever of where a difference between 422 including 100 mbs AVC-I at all without a direct comparison to the inferior formats could recognize.
Because the content plays a much larger role than the quality s.sich what the insiders with their incredibly sharpened senses is so important. But if this argument were correct, would not the amateurs after increasing resolution crying ....
And the real differences are synonymous, when times higher color depths and see .... that makes itself a very clear difference wide.
As for me s.der HPX300 yes synonymous positively true, SDH are the 2 outputs. The step to better formats (720 in 12 bit, so roughly. 200 Mbit) thus comes within reach.
In my opinion leads to better color much faster visible results better than more pixels ...
But, as I have said so a 1.8 "sensor, as of you described, there still really .... and all would be better than this lovely pixel monsters, only more artifacts to pay.
