Frage von TIKWa 7:
Canon Hello fans,
I just prepared my first video clip, which is then professionally recovered. Now I thought, as I s.besten with my XM2 records to possible to get high quality images, which are then synonymous well can be reworked. My solution is currently:
16:9 Mode
Interlaced
(If the Nachberbeitung progressive)
Manual
Procedure 0 decibels Grain
(prefer to give something underexposed in order to avoid image noise)
The goal should be that I finished the clip in anamopher 16:9 DVD quality to deliver.
The pictures which I have thus started to see very well from synonymous.
Now my question s.die experts among you: I am over with the recording format correctly, or what should I have to observe or change the recorded XM2-picture as perfect as possible?
Alone in 16:9 mode does something with a headache. The camcorder is in Recording on these shrink to Rohanamamorph in-Picture. Well, I think that exactly such a (non-anamorphic electronical intent?) Drawn together Picture synonymous to the 4:3 chips fall. So the picture later pulled a better quality than if I record it 4:3 and mask, allowing only 70% of the pixels used UMD would display the same picture. Is clear to me that the merged picture is still not a true 16:9, which only 16:9 chips like the XL2 can. But it is still sharper and less verpixelt, masked as a 4:3, or?
Liege ich da richtig?
Because in the post, it is a bit stressful with the 16:9 format to work. (No choice of image, the alpha mask of Photoshop do not want to somehow fit, but other site)
Through a well-founded information, I would be very grateful, because a lot of time and energy into this project and I do not go in advance of a general wants to make mistakes ....
Thanx! :)
Cosmic greetings,
Tikwa
-------------------------------++
More on my video project:
http://forum.slashcam.de/dawn-of-the-dead-oder-mein-erster-echter-videoclip--vp198695.html?sid=91e3265220df8c936c6717b06ec57058 # 198695
Antwort von Jan:
Yes a better 16 / 9 Picture with XM, you get 2 with a anamorphotic.
Known are the Optex adapter or the Century Widesreenadapter.
The second is here in the forum quite popular, but there are different versions. Only the DS WAS models are fully durchzoombar. The synonymous unfortunately have a different price category.
If you do not want to spend money for such a adapter (synonymous rent), would perhaps a 4 / 3 rotation better for the DM XM 2, since they approve Letterboxverfahren still Resolutionbei 16 / 9 away. That can be with a program might be better hinbiegen on 16 / 9 - please tips of the editors here.
VG
Jan
