Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Thoughts on digital imaging of rudi - 9 Mar 2008 11:19:00 Not necessarily easier Tobak and definitely too complex for beginners, but pretty interesting: In this blog entry of Stu Masch joke on Dynamics, Exposure and the Red Camera, you can learn as much as in a camera-day seminar. For those who do not persevere in reading, there is something very essence in a nutshell: If a camera stops just less than the target medium (eg film), one must logically upon turning to decide whether you prefer the lights or the shadows will go. If his goal is not exactly media knows it is a rule of thumb usually better to bring the lights and with the camera deliberately underexpose.
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von baerenbold:
... this is the good old reversal film / slide film as synonymous:
Overexposed games are lost, there is usually nothing more out in the often underexposed but still something.
It would would be shining on the outside of windows with a tulle or ND foil slightly dim, then the exposure would remain in the green area.
Antwort von Jens König:
The article mainly deals with the themes of "dynamic range", "compression" and "limiting" (This just in relation to light, in most cases, these terms in the audio processing is used, but are obtainable all Signal Processing)
Ultimately, the author attenuates the input signal to its analog-digital converter stage can not be controlled. Episode: The resolution of a certain level range drops by. Would this mean that for example in case of slight changes in brightness of the image the same surface brightness will be greater and the number of surfaces is demgemässgeringer. I am more familiar with signal theory, as with the AD converter Resolutionder a Camera (12bit?), But think it should be before one underexposed, which give it a try.
Sorry, no graphics or so, I can now on the fast dei not explain better;)
jens
