Frage von banksy:
Hi folks,
as already mentioned in the title, I am on the lookout for a suitable tripod for VX 1000th
Until now I always Cullmann 2800 uses of a friend but now he does it again and I need a replacement.
My requirements would be a s.das Tripod Height of about 1.5 meters, a spirit, and of course sturdy legs and a fixed standard
As a student of course, money plays a big role, the Velbon DV -7000 for me ca.105 is already too expensive.
I've now scheduled 50-70 ¬, but I have no idea whether this price range is realistic.
Freu me about your answers.
beste grüße
Stephan
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Velbon DV -7000 for me ca.105 is already too expensive ...'ve now scheduled 50-70 ¬ The Velbon DV7000's now gone back for under 100 euros, and even cheaper, you will get no tripod, which is somewhat comparable. So: Put another 30 euros to your budget on it and you and your VX1000 will be happy!
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Johannes:
10 ¬ save you if you get the predecessor DV6000 hohl more but I would never save. Had recently synonymous in the sour apple and bite me (for me) to buy an expensive tripod, but it's worth it to me!
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
The DV 7000 you had to get far less coal in objektivo.de I have a few weeks ago neunundachtzignochwas paid.
105 ¬ would be the way, certainly not synonymous too much money.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von lugburz:
as wärs
with the Velbon CX586 I have the synonymous and it was 2 years ago cost 60 ¬ and believe it is now cheaper! Gibts at Media Markt, Saturn ...
lg fabian
Antwort von lugburz:
http://www.idealo.at/preisvergleich/OffersOfProduct/379386_-cx-586-velbon.html
Antwort von Johannes:
For Google products is 94 ¬, the cheapest offer.
Forget the other Billigmist. Then you pay once more, has more problems than pleasure.
Antwort von C.I.W:
For Henkel camera anyway, I would not smaller, cheaper tripod use. Incidentally, the Hab synonymous Dv 7000th The part I think you can easily load up to 5Kg. Let's see how the part with a shoulder camera makes ....
Antwort von Johannes:
Let's see how the part with a shoulder camera makes .... You have to be synonymous, but it always can be important ;-)
Antwort von banksy:
Hi,
thank you for your quick responses.
The dv 7000 seems to be absolutely top, but synonymous its price.
The CX 586 is priced for me, a dream, but it can be with my old tripod, keep the Cullmann 2800 (which has the criticisms Cx 586)?
Or:
If the dv 7000 or do I need synonymous with the cheaper models work well?
I hope you can here me yet what help is needed.
beste grüße
Stephan
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Forget the other Billigmist. Then you pay once more, has more problems than pleasure. Here you will find hardly anyone who was on the DV 7000 has suspended ... and the criticism is a very joyful community :-))
Purchase this Part and s.dafür.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von HighDefinition:
if the Cullmann so good, then you purchase it, it costs 66euro! but lies in the price limit for you?
cx586 which is fluid dampened comes to a height of 165 (s.1, 50 is slightly wobbly), hold a camera up to 7kg ... more loose, I can not tell you
Antwort von Bernd E.:
cx586 ... ... hold a camera up to 7kg loose from ... As the manufacturer, a weight limit of just 2.4 kilograms indicating such stress, I would not exaggerate ;-)
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von C.I.W:
What can be as large as even happen. I would be synonymous my Velbon synonymous my 15kg Kamerakran screws. That would be really no problem, but you must not let it arrive.
The DV 7000 and the CX .. have no idea the same head. If you like the stability is not so important so you can buy the cheaper synonymous.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... DV 7000 and the CX .. have no idea the same head. The same head as the DV7000, the CX-686.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von HighDefinition:
http://www.idealo.de/preisvergleich/OffersOfProduct/378619_-cx-686-velbon.html
if the cx686 kop same as the dv7000, but then would be the correct and full in your price!
Do not believe this because such a large difference in the Stanfestigkeit is Somali du Henkel yes only one camera is used
Antwort von Johannes:
And whether one has a large difference. Since the Dv7000 2kg and the Cx686 weighs much less. You should know that the more heavier the tripod is even more so stop it (greater stability).
Antwort von HighDefinition:
The manufacturer says:
dv7000: 2.2
cx586: 1.8
uuuuhhhh! 0.4 difference!
Antwort von Johannes:
That's quite a difference! Even further score in the DV7000 is much more stable than the CX686. I had myself the cx686 and I've never drüber happy.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
uuuuhhhh! 0.4 difference! Does not quite the DV7000 weighs just under 3.4 kilograms - this value is at least the manufacturer, if you read the data correctly Comparison ;-) but above all times the specified weight limits for the load, ie how hard the camera can be:
CX-586 2.4 kilograms
CX-686 2.4 kilograms
DV7000 4.5 kilograms
Well, the penny dropped?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Maria Perez:
yes, me is really eh no preference
read quickly halt drüber, p
Antwort von ralleschaffrath:
Hey folks,
somehow, the e-mail notification does not work anymore and I did not know that there are other posts relating to there.
I have now for the dv 7000 decided it was safe to synonymous never knows what the future brings kamera: D
Thank you all for your help
beste grüße
Stephan
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Wise decision! In the price category, there is probably nothing better.
Antwort von Maximilian Flügellos:
Forget the other Billigmist. Then you pay once more, has more problems than pleasure.
Here you will find hardly anyone who was on the DV 7000 has suspended ... and the criticism is a very joyful community :-))
Purchase this Part and s.dafür.
BG
Andreas Can this author synonymous read?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
What do you want to know for now?
