Frage von shakespeare2000:
Hello together,
One of my happy as can be described beginners. Currently I am in the process, the equipment for my cam to be completed, in principle, but have not the necessary knowledge to help those for the later outcome crucial factors - such as the UV and the WW-well - to make informed choices .
For this reason I would be pleased if you me with your rich experience in buying a little hand could.
Basically, the question arises whether it is mandatory because the expensive original equipment manufacturer must be whether or not synonymous equally effective alternatives without loss of quality can be used.
As for the UV, for example, there are significant price differences:
- The Original Equipment (EWL 82 UV) of Fujinon proposes with 360 ¬ to Beech
(http://www.sts2.de/efl82uv-fujinon-uvfilter-filtergewinde-p-2439.html)
- A UV-of HAMA would be about 120 ¬ to have many good experiences with the products of HAMA Assessment. These could either of these
(http://www.hama.de/portal/articleId 36865/action * * 2563/searchMode * 1/bySearch * 82mm)
or this
(http://www.hama.de/portal/articleId 37314/action * * 2563/searchMode * 1/bySearch * 82mm)
Good to finally offers me a UK shop still synonymous Tiffen for 20 pounds of - and about Tiffen synonymous, I have yet found nothing really negative, but the price (about ¬ 30) makes me just a little aback. Said Tiffen place here:
(http://www.amazon.com/Tiffen-82mm-UV-Protection-/dp/B00004ZCK0)
Now the real question:
Can Tiffen with the results, as well as with the Fujinon is the case?
Is the price a reflection of the quality, or are these substantial differences simply unfounded?
Has anyone of you experience with such filters, and if so - what?
And: Do I need an adapter ring, a WW and a UV-operate simultaneously? What is here at the choice be respected?
Have in advance thanks for your help!
Shakespeare2000
--
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Question whether it is mandatory because the expensive original equipment manufacturer must be ... EWL of 82 UV Fujinon ... 360 ¬ ... The original must not be, and 360 euros for a UV this size is impudent to ask. For approximately one quarter of which you should be just as good a brand manufacturers such as B + W (Schneider-Kreuznach) or Heliopan get. With Hama filters, I have little experience, but consistently good - if the glass is mehrschichtvergütet. But a UV, which is not, you can ignore it anyway.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Shakespeare2000
... Hand on heart times .... buy as you now expect with Camera and Lens of law as synonymous all other components the best possible performance and the ultimate image quality.
The designers have certainly (even with this lens) big trouble, most of the optical beam path to get out.
Now you come with a $ 20 piece of broken glass from the corner store, the (UV) in 99% of all applications so superfluous as there is a goitre and screw your body sensitive s.die Picture Transfer: the optical beam path.
Locking the Camera s.einen good times monitor, s.dem You synonymous picture really see it.
Then consider the real picture in all its details or make a stop in a good quality image of it.
Then screw the glass parts of times before and do again a Picture.
And then comparative times. Since you will be blurred in certain areas of the image discover emigrating colors .... and much more.
Überleg you then check out what you will actually achieve and when you need it. Actually there is only one real use for it and comes in the Central as well as never before.
My advice .... no ... To make you the best pictures and s.meisten Save Money. :-)
Antwort von shakespeare2000:
Hello Both,
First of all thank you for your info.
After the contribution of WoWu I will purchase the UV erstmal back until I find that the signature had recommended book through.
A demand, however, remains:
WoWu - you write, it appears that "even with this lens' has been tried, the best out of.
Your wording leaves considerable room for interpretation as to the quality of this lens too - I was right, if I assume that you are rather regarded as inferior? Why? What are the weaknesses?
Again, Thanks in advance!
shakespeare2000
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Shakespeare2000
It is like everything in life, always a question of entitlement.
The lens has some weak points that you must know in order to circumnavigate, if you really high value on good pictures sets.
Overlooked it makes good pictures Lens synonymous ... so far can not simply say that it is bad. It only needs s.den cameraman and his knowledge.
But in the book are sample images synonymous and synonymous weaknesses are identified. (Choose the download that is inexpensive and colorful.)
Synonymous One must never forget that the price structure Camera / Lens, certainly not part of the high value of taking .... and this is the lens, however, very good. You see, it's all a question of relationships.
My Résumé is clean settings and make it come out with super photos. But just go off and lets the camera in auto run mode, you have less chance of any good pictures.
