Frage von Bobolein:
Hi, I have my ADVC-300 is currently connected via a scart to RCA adapter and then go with Firewire in the PC. The results are synonymous very good.
A scart adapter so I guess because my VHS recorder and nothing else has just come my new s.15.05. Now I wonder how I new then s.besten veritable?
The new one has all the inputs and outputs you need and is an SVHS recorder of Panasonic.
Which of the Mögklichkeiten brings the best quality?
1.) Scart adapter to RCA (video, audio L / R)
2.) Direct from the SVHS-Rec. with RCA (Video, Audio L / R) in the ADVC-300
or
3.) Using S-Video cable from VCR to the ADVC-300 + Audio via RCA
In short: What is better S-video or composite? It is only VHS cassettes not SVHS.
Thank you in advance.
Antwort von beiti:
In short: What is better S-video or composite? It is only VHS cassettes not SVHS. As long as you only play VHS, there should be no difference.
Antwort von konst:
Hi, I have my ADVC-300 is currently connected via a scart to RCA adapter and then go with Firewire in the PC. The results are synonymous very good.
A scart adapter so I guess because my VHS recorder and nothing else has just come my new s.15.05. Now I wonder how I new then s.besten veritable?
The new one has all the inputs and outputs you need and is an SVHS recorder of Panasonic.
Which of the Mögklichkeiten brings the best quality?
1.) Scart adapter to RCA (video, audio L / R)
2.) Direct from the SVHS-Rec. with RCA (Video, Audio L / R) in the ADVC-300
or
3.) Using S-Video cable from VCR to the ADVC-300 + Audio via RCA
In short: What is better S-video or composite? It is only VHS cassettes not SVHS.
Thank you in advance. , arrives to try something better. (This a good preview monitor or television with a good S-Video cable to connect the Canopus s.den Output) S-Video cable, especially poor, can lead to image distortion. may lead to the simple composite signal results even better, because it is synonymous of Canopus 300 yes again treated specially.
Antwort von uifei:
Because we're on the wiring:
Have www.digitalschnitt.de found on an entry that, in the wiring of the Firewire interface should be especially careful when it comes to cable itself.
Can there please someone once say something more precise?
Thank you uifei
Antwort von martinsw:
Thanks for the replies, helped me a lot. I now have one more question.
If the TBC eingeschltet the ADVC-300 auto? Or, or you can turn off the one-and? If so where / how? I have a video that is digitized with strong horizontal jitter at all here but the TBC has nothing availed. I really thought the problems would be eliminated or at least minimized.
Hence the question.
Thank you very much.
Antwort von StefanS:
As long as you only play VHS, there should be no difference. Since the 300 Canopus so now all the "improvements" has the same s.Bord, may be a difference between composite and S-video mixers setter may not be so great, but in the analog domain only decide alone and the signal quality, and that is with an S - video signal of a higher-VCR better than the composite signal of a field, forest and meadow-VHS.
When I first years with the Hollywood Bridge - Canopus was the 300's as yet and it was quite s.Anfang of the fact that I once had with the subject of video will work on - my old VHS-C was transferred recordings, I have the first Father's expensive S-VHS recorder in Comparison to my normal VCR playback devices and tested as the digitized version was leaked via S-Video out better than via composite.
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von Markus:
If the TBC eingeschltet the ADVC-300 auto? [...] I have a video that is digitized with strong horizontal jitter at all here but the TBC has nothing availed. You said you digitalisierst VHS tapes. Are they copies? In this case would be different) Recorded between jitter (= image content and jitter, which leads to a messy when playing video signal.
Is generated when playing a "crooked" video signal, the ADVC-300 is in its identify and correct errors. Is it an image content, it can not. I am not aware of TB, which could then.
