Frage von Mario W.:
Hello
I have a Panasonic NV-GS180. So a fairly good camera. The films can be synonymous 1a of the camera on the firewire card to the hard drive to play. When I see the movies then look at the calculator, they are absolutely synonymous top.
I now edit the movie with Ulead VideoStudio 10 and separate the film into 5 scenes and more as a headline, and the film is already qualitatively worse. There are veils or streaks on s.Rändern. Especially when something is moving faster. I save my file as a result (because I have not the poor quality DVD burning would like) and see the finished film with the original film, so is there a huge difference in the quality of her.
My question now: What can I do? Because I've finally, after all, the program to edit the film and the scene transitions to reshape. If I were there with another program better off?
Regards and thanks already times in advance, Mario W.
Antwort von Markus73:
...
I now edit the movie with Ulead VideoStudio 10 and separate the film into 5 scenes and more as a headline, and the film is already qualitatively worse. There are veils or streaks on s.Rändern. Especially when something is moving faster. I save my file as a result (because I have not the poor quality DVD burning would like) and see the finished film with the original film, so is there a huge difference in the quality of her. [...] Hello Mario,
that could s.dem usual interlace problem. If the Halbbildreihenfolge on the DVD player for the usual "lower field first" is set, the whole s.PC may not look good and it has taken Kammuster movements, especially s.senkrechten lines. It would therefore be important for the DVD player, some movies always synonymous only s.DVD final player to evaluate.
This (and against the problems caused by MPEG encoding with low data rate / quality of) the fact that you have these structures during the processing s.Screen see. So as I said, go on this path once all the way to the end (possibly a test DVD-RW), only then is synonymous to judge possible.
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von Angiecam:
Hello,
exactly the same problem I have Ulead synonymous with 10th Images seen on tape still good, after editing then immerse the famously ugly comb on. Problem is that my pictures for advertising and movies that are probably not only on DVD player compatriots, but synonymous s.PC. When I look at the films as with PowerDVD, you can see still ugly. I play of Cam via firewire, as lower field first should be true, right?
How can I understand this Interlace / De-interlace thing at Ulead Studio 10 set? (Sorry if it's something to exist, but both have this as synonymous the Ulead forum be trimmed and nothing useful - and for a dummy like me understand - found)
Many greetings
Antwort von Markus:
Hi,
a very important information is missing in your description of the problem: What happens between the capture and the video output? What is your project settings? With the wrong targets, you can place s.dieser much vergeigen ...
... Halbbildreihenfolge on the basis of the usual DVD-player "lower field first" DVDs can have both Halbbildfolgen. The DVD player must be signed by the respective Picture-/Tonträger only get told what order will be delivered.
@ All: What is important is that with the Halbbildfolge no experiments are made. The best material is processed continuously as it exists. For most computer users, this should "be lower field first". Some systems rotate the video when capturing Halbbildfolge but synonymous around, such as the Matrox video card RT.X100.
Learn More:
DV FAQ: What Halbbildreihenfolge when and where?
Antwort von Angiecam:
Thank you ever! After an afternoon of experimentation, I discovered VirtualDub, with the deinterlace filter, do I get the movie out now, as he should be.
Many greetings
Antwort von Markus:
... with the deinterlace filter, do I get the movie out now, as he should be. You know what you're doing?
What I mean:
Deinterlaces ... yes but no?
Antwort von dj-senol:
Hello s.alle.
Thank you for the many replies.
So when do I actually capturing any experiments. I put my desired format one (at my Pal DVD 4:3) and then leave the automatic settings.
Only the comic is yes, if I film with the editing program and open up to watch it, everything is still wonderful. I now edit this film (so what the program should be), and look him in the preview window, I can already see this Kammuster. Here I have not even made any settings.
Oh, incidentally, s.Schluß the issuance of the film material is in the settings (which I do not change), synonymous drin "lower field first".
Mist actually been a shame if the initial material is a good result comes out worse. Or do I perhaps was wrong? What I do not imagine, because I Einstellungsmäßig not the slightest change.
Regards Mario
Antwort von dj-senol:
... with the deinterlace filter, do I get the movie out now, as he should be.
You know what you're doing?
What I mean:
Deinterlaces ... yes but no? Hi Markus
I have times of this story you read. As I understand it, these strips are synonymous or Kammuster only on the PC monitor. And if I then burn everything to DVD and have it on the television watch, it would theoretically be gone. Hmmm. I then have to try.
Regards Mario
Antwort von Markus:
As I understand it ... ... you have understood correctly. ;-)
Antwort von dj-senol:
Super Yes, Get me tomorrow same time ne DVD-RW and then try it again.
And if it does not work? What then?
Regards Mario
Antwort von Markus:
And if it does not work? What then? Then get you here again. ;-)
Antwort von dj-senol:
All clear. The mach ich. I wish synonymous but if it worked. If so again someone has a problem, then at least he knows, it is s.was.
Thank you and see you tomorrow, or so.
Regards Mario
Antwort von dj-senol:
... with the deinterlace filter, do I get the movie out now, as he should be.
You know what you're doing?
What I mean:
Deinterlaces ... yes but no? Well, I'll not explain all the technical details of what will happen ... But I really want the pictures just for visiting s.PC. If I what's DVD player burn times, it's still interlaced, that is clear - have already noticed that the clips on the PC so terribly look aufm TV again are good.
I go just assume that the deinterlacer of choice is ... If I did have a mistake, tell about it:)
Antwort von Markus:
[... that the clips on the pc look so terribly ...] I just do believe that the deinterlacer of choice is ... For a view s.PC yes. Just a look at what I may contribute to (and synonymous to the image format) wrote.
Ultimately treads so you have two different ways when the same material both s.Television as synonymous s.PC wants to watch: In one case, everything remains exactly as it is now looks like s.Television good.
In the other case the video is deinterlaced and square on the image pixels converted: Then s.Computer it looks good.
Antwort von dj-senol:
[... that the clips on the pc look so terribly ...] I just do believe that the deinterlacer of choice is ...
For a view s.PC yes. Just a look at what I may contribute to (and synonymous to the image format) wrote. I have. I understand including the following: If the finished clip aufm DVD recorder to be viewed, then let interlaced. If the clip aufm Calculator wants to watch, then deinterlace. True or false?
Antwort von Angiecam:
Sorry the above was of help to me, have forgotten the name;)
Antwort von Markus:
Sorry the above was of help to me, have forgotten the name;) Right. - That it incidentally synonymous. ;-)
Antwort von Angiecam:
Tzt;) Be more careful! Thanks for the tips, now I know a little more precise, I was doing:)
Antwort von pharao:
I take this opportunity and post here next,
wrote a similar problem
I take my digi tray using nero to
Settings are DV / PAL, etc. ... So everything standard.
the file is created which is about 13 GIGA great, as far as good
when I look at this file s.PC then runs the error if I take this as normal with NERO and burn in my DVD player set,
then I have ever such small quadrate in the Picture, I'm slowly s.verzweifeln, hab schon 4 blanks vergeigt.
can someone tell me what I can possibly be adjusted?
hab ein LG DVD BURNERS, GSA 4160B with the brand new firmware.
many thanks
Antwort von darkcobalt:
who is really quick and easy clean wishes
should make a dvd-recorder use.
gruß cj
Antwort von kleines:
Hello!
Fits not to interlace problem, but to the title: I capture the DV video on adobe premiere pro.Wenn me I look in the preview window, they have no loss of quality. If I then cut the video to dv-avi to disk, the picture faded and blurred.
And in a direct-mpeg-encode Comparison generates pinnacle studio 10 the picture better than Premiere, with "mpeg-dvd compatible" settings.
Antwort von Markus:
If I do I look in the preview window ... ... then let the video quality is not assessed, because too many factors s.Picture herummurksen. The same applies to the exported DV AVI. Only when television comes into play, can a correct picture controls are implemented.
See synonymous:
Video recordings s.Computermonitor not look good
