Frage von Der Toni:
Hello Forum.
Unfortunately, the theme of "export" in the FAQ entry is not yet dealt with, so my question here.
Have a short video (2min), which I am a particular target group (40 people) would like to make available (download from website). My first attempt with a qualitatively good MPEG2 file failed due to the fact that many of the extra people would have a codec to download and have wanted it honestly does not, as some IT with s.Board Dummies (yes, the do not know how you what to install:)
Now, of course the question of which format is usable quality and 'out of the box' works. I would, because spontaneously WMV Ein? However, I have no idea with what settings I get the best results. And the combinations durchzuprobieren (various media releases, etc.), sigh .... Maybe someone can give me some tips? Or perhaps an alternative format?
Here are some background info and specifications:
- File for download or online viewing
- Filesize should not be about 100MB
- The target group is mainly standard configuration (XP, W2K, with Windows Media Player), very few have a codec pack installed. 95% have a fast broadband connection
- Movie is 2:11 long, with DV material and photos
- About the Framesize I have not yet determined
Tools: Work with PPro 1.5 (standard), but could be synonymous to a calculator with 2.0 and Procorder2 (?) Access (Uni).
Btw, if you are good arguments against WMV did, let me perhaps still talking about a download link for the audience to send with ... but then tell what you would prefer;)
Thank you for your tips !!!!! The Toni.
Antwort von Wiro:
... good arguments against WMV Hi Toni,
nööö, we have not. Why? The whole world is WMVs and transverse cross into the net, and all are happy and satisfied with it ;-))
Export> Adobe Media Encoder> Windows Media> WM9 PAL download. . .
- 1024 = 768x576 square pixels (or 640x480)
- 768 = 384x288 square pixels
- 512 = 320x240 square pixels
Find one from you, what your expectations.
Under "Tasks before encoding" Merging activate.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von transsib:
[...] Nööö, we have not. Why? The whole world is WMVs and transverse cross into the net, and all are happy and satisfied with it ;-))
Export> Adobe Media Encoder> Windows Media> WM9 PAL download. . . [...] Well - that I thought previously synonymous. My experience: WMV9 have very many users still do not, then once the game with Media Player update release. Even WMV8 have surprisingly many Windows users are not yet on it. Therefore, I recommend that if there must be WMV, maximum WMV8 to use. That is at least quite some time in the Media Player. In addition, more and more users are working with Linux systems, which until recently, the proprietary Microsoft format WMV9 play it. Similarly, it should probably behave in Macs?
If you value most advantageous for compatibility and quality is not so important, then make MPEG1. This can be played virtually anywhere.
My recommendation for good quality playback on Linux, Mac and Windows computers and is minimal Intallationsaufwand XviD. That you can not directly export from PP 1.5, but that you're super compatible and if there is someone who is not running, he must not install bold player but can dannn alone install the codec, which is only about 600 and is n.groß then the video as usual in the Media Player. In addition, more and more new DVD player from XviD.
Gruß, Oliver
Antwort von Wiro:
The target group is mainly standard configuration (XP, W2K, with Windows Media Player) ... 95% have a fast broadband connection Hello Transsib,
who can read is a clear advantage
;-)
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von transsib:
The target group is mainly standard configuration (XP, W2K, with Windows Media Player) ... 95% have a fast broadband connection
Hello Transsib,
who can read is a clear advantage
;-)
Gruss Wiro Eben - hence my recommendation to WMV8 or XviD. WMV8 can at least s.Win98 and the Professional systems by default s.W2K be played. WMV9 is only by default IMHO s.XP SP2. Then once the Updaterei going on - not only from the Media Player. The current version of Media Player is synonymous nor s.bestimmte versions of DirectX and Internet Explorer combined. For, quote: "IT Dummies" is in my experience less suitable. Moreover schriebt Toni, that the target group "primarily" on a standard configuration with XP and W2K has. I could bet that because so many still have Win95 on it, on a Mac or Linux works. Especially with WMV9 can then for (very) cheerful hours care. ;-). A fortiori in the 5%, so the 2 people who do not even have a broadband connection.
I have therefore recently worked with XviD because I s.Telefon at WMV8 too often heard "is not" "why not?" "no idea" - na toll! XviD has only once the disadvantage that only a few people have the codec installed, but this is a very simple procedure fixed - download (with or burn to a CD), double-click "OK" button, wait, Calculator Reboot, done. Can anyone who works for everyone.
But - the most universal codec is, of course, still MPEG1.
And: MPEG2 is not free (legally) to the "just so" to install.
Of course, this is my personal opinion - I would like WMV9 of compatibility reasons, but in any case advise. There are at least each second stress.
Gruß, Oliver
Antwort von Der Toni:
Hello.
Thanks for the answers! I would like to discuss what to add.
Was now just a (test-) file some available as of Wiro stimulated with the Media Encoder (WMV9 PAL 1024 download) exported. The quality is really ok! However, it seems really true that you only come back to download a codec needs. Synonymous, I believe that many do not have SP2 for XP's have it. However - Win95 and 98, I can exclude, the None actually has more of those ...
Now the question is, would WM8 to download additional codecs largely avoided? And - how big would the quality difference between WM8 and WM9 (as I said, with the 9s was already in order!)?
Alternatively to Transsib's legitimate statement: If the encoding XVid with the quality difference justified? (I can not test it immediately, because at work) If it really is in the visible range, to download the codecs can I come over to talk.
Thank you - I have much more next than previously. But not quite s.Ziel ... ;-) The Toni.
Antwort von transsib:
Hi Toni!
If really all at least have Win98 on it, no NT, Linux and not synonymous with any Mac, then take WMV8. Even if M $ with great quality and legendary Compression for WMV9 advertises, is in my eyes the main difference between WMV8 and WMV9 that supports WMV9 synonymous HDV. WMV9 is unquestionably better than WMV8, but not really dramatic. Try it out. Try synonymous times have a somewhat higher data rate - then you'll see any change something and what does not. The small advantage in my eyes is not proportionate to the anger that one of the incompatibilities native. It also supports WMV9 (I am not certain) probably synonymous rather dubious blessings of modern times such as DRM, which in your case anyway does not matter.
You could of course synonymous just 2 or 3 version generate what PP 1.5 out so no problem: for example, WMV 8, WMV9 and a DVD, for users without high speed internet.
Gruß, Oliver
Antwort von Josefa:
One can, incidentally xvid-export from premiere on ffdshow!
Antwort von andreas jigme:
Hello,
I have been working for years with videos and it's true: Windows media is on the rise ... unfortunately it is not always a really good quality is achieved. Somehow, the files from the subjective impression of her often somewhat "washed out" from. I do not mags.
To download and general distribution in my opinion, is still THE mpeg1 format of choice.
Looks good with a good encoder is with ALL systems without if and but compatible and will run even on its old Pentium 1 Win95 Möhre office or even 485er ....
I just mags. And ever tried ne Windows mediafile scrolling? Goes with mpeg1 easy. Main argument, however, is probably the most foolproof universal compatibility.
Good luck,
Andreas.
