Infoseite // What a raid on DV editing? FW800, eSata, NAS?



Frage von clint:


Hello,
has a GBit NAS enough performance for the (HDV -) DV editing? Theoretically, yes should be faster than FW800, but how's looks in practice. Have at least have never heard that this makes jem. - nciht why?

So I'm talking of SOHO NAS, such as here
http://www.dlink.de/?go=jN7uAYLx/oIJaWVUDLYZU93ygJVYKuJXStvhLPG3yV3oV492j6ltbNlwaaRp + X19Vnq1zitUvt1LVILi0KfkJl8TtunfaIGwFA ==

thx and ciao
clint

Space


Antwort von Marco:

HDV editing requires little hard drive performance as well as DV editing. The data rates are identical, unless compressed with low intermediates are used. So if it remains in HDV, is a fast RAID money. A fast CPU would be the better investment.

Marco

Space


Antwort von clint:

Hi & thanks,
because I work with a MacBookPro, I need quick ext. Memory. Only a NAS überhaupt for DV editing suitable?

Space


Antwort von wolfgang:

Depends - many of today's NAS dice are somewhat slower than if a plate is directly attached. Depends probably used up by the controller, because I'd been a little careful.

Space


Antwort von Marco:

"because I work with a MacBookPro, I need quick ext. Memory."

You mean, because the Mac is not HDV natively, but with auto Intermediates?

Marco

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash