Frage von Mephisto123:
Hi!
Wide Anglesollte what they grow in?
Of the Sonyist twice as expensive, probably synonymous very well made, but Raynox had surprised me before ner ner before schonmal time with the very price-performance ratio.
Has anyone tried both views and experiences about this?
Mehpisto
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
I still have from the days of my SonyPC the WW-100E-HG0737 Converter SonyVCL (ie without y) that fits the (synonymous as the Batteries) for the HC1. The picture quality is excellent, the converter is fully durchzoombar.
Greeting
KDS
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
Here and in the following thread pages you find some user Rewi test images with some MF lenses:
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/showthread.php?t=790&page=1&pp=10
I had very good experiences with the camcorder-wide-angle lenses of Canon, excellent sharpness, very little vignetting and virtually no chromatic aberrations / color fringing synonymous with very high-camcorder Zoom.Ich times the WD-46 WW zb-Converter Canon of hate, the was a hammer, everything synonymous with maximum zoom and color schärfemässig absolutely 1A (s.etwa 10x zoom can a zunehmde, slight darkening picture anyway not be completely avoided), eight in each case to a model with 3 or 4 instead of 2 - Lens system take is usually always better quality because the beam is properly maintained better (3Linsen for all Canon camcorder models in the MF case) Raynox synonymous making excellent Lenses - vorallen the HD-pro-series is recommended, also very well the New HAMA-WW-Obejktive with HTMC-Compensation (Remuneration Missing but yes you can Filtervorsätzen synonymous with spice), in Hama but there are only 2 lenses - is then more susceptible at high zoom.
For the HC1 would eg Canon WD-37 or WD-H37 (magnification: 0.7) appropriately. For Canon Camcorders-WW-intentions's just silly, the only there is no front thread, nothing with sun visor & Co then :-( If you want access, I'd be the Raynox.
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
Is there for a reason why I suggested to you a Canon WW.
Here is a wide-Comparison of Canon WD-46 (0.7) v Raynox HD 6600PRO (0.66):
Test pictures with maximum zoom camcorder:
WW-Raynox HD-6600PRO (0.66):
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=134&stc=1
Canon WW-WD-46 (0.7):
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=140&stc=1
Especially a bit sharper and better edge sharpness especially who sleeps even the HD pro ... not sure Forntgewinde, well ...
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
With Sony's WW's unfortunately I have little experience regarding KENKO-Wide Anglehate I time a Kenko KRW-05, but was rather misserabel and showed fairly high loss of sharpness at much zoom.
The general rule in all VV's: All the smaller the magnification value (0.7 / 0.5 ,...), the more problems especially with the sharpness (especially edge sharpness) and darkening at high zoom.
Because of the lack of Frontgewinden Canon camcorder-WW-intentions:
My solution here was simply an adapter ring which in diameter is a little thicker around the housing (of course as close to the front lens) stick to (fill in the gap with glue easy), this can be just as everything anschrauben.Als adhesive is suited to a Pattex Repair extremes very well (get) you in hardware stores - is a Solvent-free adhesive after curing with silikonähnlicher substance of 100% chemically synonymous especially the PS / ABS plastic construction ensures will not attack and high temp and weather-resistant, he ist.Da colorless / transparent, then the whole looks pretty synonymous.
(it was now, hopefully not too OFF-TOPIC)
