Frage von Rolf Hankel:
Hello
Am currently totally undecided what I mean by Pana.NV GS 400 to replace.
Can AVCHD change, or is that in 2 years already synonymous of snow yesterday?
Gruss Rolf
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Then wait 2 years but just starting. The GS400 is great.
Antwort von beiti:
Can AVCHD change, or is that in 2 years already synonymous of snow yesterday? On the contrary. In two years, AVCHD is really nice, because until then the computing power of the computer for editing native AVCHD is sufficient. ;)
I think the 2-year-reflection is superfluous. The recording format is losing more and more s.Bedeutung it is only the first step on the way to the film and, therefore, only for you and your work flow of practical concern. At the end, you then will have a Blu-ray Disc or an HD movie on a home server, whether originally in ACVHD in HDV or any other HD format was no longer interested in then - as now anyone interested whether the contents of a DVD from an original MPEG-hard camcorder, a DV camcorder or sonstwoher came. Crucial to the future security is that you have a HD-format (ie as some kind of 1080/50i, 720/25p or 720/50p), because the medium is the significance, which still SD video (576/50i better). The actual format is secondary.
So if you buy today a camcorder, HDV, or AVCHD take (depending on what you now in a better fit stuff - the pros and cons you can in the forum enough to read). If you're in two years, a camcorder buy, works perhaps still in AVCHD or in a further development of AVCHD, and it is from today's perspective, no preference. What you buy is always best if the state of the art - now just like in two years. The trend is always next.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
Thanks for your answers, so my calculator with Quad Q 9550 (4x2, 83Ghz) should be with the right editing program, already packed AVCHD
The second problem is the camcorder. I got in the Forum have been written, what is currently offered, is in my eyes, everything
well, a little toy. I hope that since the new year was coming true.
Gruss Rolf
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Rolf
You should always format your goal keep in mind. If it is exclusively for use on Blu-ray is used, then AVCHD is certainly better for you, because it is not quite no preference, which acquisition format is selected.
When cascading different codecs are image defects that are behind disruptive felt.
Also, the different procedures and different quality characteristics of your product is behind only as good as the worst link in the chain. This affects synonymous (even) the quality of the camera and especially the optics, because all these procedures have one thing in common ... they work with sharp images significantly Tevez, as with blurs.
So I would always synonymous of a 3-chip camera will still give preference to. (For several reasons). That, however, may over time change, when for once sound chip sizes are used.
I agree with you in relation to the current market situation, what concerns camcorder, agrees.
Antwort von domain:
.. what is currently offered, is in my eyes, everything
well, a little toy. I hope that since the new year was coming true.
The hope would be too intense, I do not cherish. Cameras such as the HC1 or the SR12 for example in the direction Abstellgeleise or are already parked there.
The low turnover group of advanced amateurs for the Manufacturer uninteresting.
The need today is more> ¬ 3000 and min. 1.5 n.Henkel in hand, so that what they receive equivalent.
Antwort von WoWu:
For me the end s.unteren runs a "Hd-layer", which all have the same initial profile:
TV transmission with HP@L4.0
Pana camcorder / Canon with HP@4.1 Sonysogar only with MP@4.0
Blu-ray with MP@4.0 / 4.1 and HP@4.0 / 4.1
Thus, the maximum quality Consumer lashed his.
The purchasing power of the weak group advanced amateurs for the Manufacturer uninteresting.
The need today is more> ¬ 3000 and min. 1.5 n.Henkel in hand, so that what they receive equivalent. I share your opinion, especially against the background of what quality actually possible ...
But that is expected with the lashed restrictions remain deprived of the consumer.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
.. what is currently offered, is in my eyes, everything
well, a little toy. I hope that since the new year was coming true.
The hope would be too intense, I do not cherish. Cameras such as the HC1 or the SR12 for example in the direction Abstellgeleise or are already parked there.
The low turnover group of advanced amateurs for the Manufacturer uninteresting.
The need today is more> ¬ 3000 and min. 1.5 n.Henkel in hand, so that what they receive equivalent. Verflixt again, as the pensioner is still solid in order to save his "Henkelmann" to come, I think because s.Pana.HMC 151
Gruss Rolf
Antwort von Quadruplex:
You should always format your goal keep in mind. Correct.
If it is exclusively for use on Blu-ray is used, then AVCHD is certainly better for you, because it is not quite no preference, which acquisition format is selected.
When cascading different codecs are image defects that are behind disruptive felt. Yes and? On Blu-ray it is HDV (ie MPEG-2/1440x1080) as natively save as H.264. What the poet wants to say?
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
You should always format your goal keep in mind.
Correct.
If it is exclusively for use on Blu-ray is used, then AVCHD is certainly better for you, because it is not quite no preference, which acquisition format is selected.
When cascading different codecs are image defects that are behind disruptive felt.
Yes and? On Blu-ray it is HDV (ie MPEG-2/1440x1080) as natively save as H.264. What the poet wants to say? Yes because what he wants to say now?
Pending Rolf
Antwort von WoWu:
This once again the nonsense is what Quadruplex because once again the best there, because in MPEG 2 Blu-ray can only:
MP @ HL and MP @ ML to.
But
not MP @ HL-14. His favorite 1440x1080i25 or 1440x1080p24 goes with Blu-ray exclusively in
MPEG4 AVC / SMPTE VC1 (which is not synonymous HDMI primany format)
In other words .... With HDV, you can in Blu-ray will be
nothing. Pity that Quadruplex with his sayings glitters more than with correct information.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
Pity that Quadruplex with his sayings glitters more than with correct information. [/ Quote]
Jetzt mal ne very simple question: Is it worth it for me as a serious amateur (ie not only as rumfilmer) the Pana. NV GS 400 by SonySr 11 or 12 to replace
Gruss Rolf
Antwort von domain:
Absolutely.
It is this camera still has a certain positive weight and synonymous viewfinders and a very good display.
Integrated hard disks are probably only a temporary solution, but just as robust as in the laptop and because there has to synonymous None.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Rolf
If you just so "rumfilmen" want is certainly not a bad camera.
If you want to cut s.Computer but you must also note that Sonyein different profiles as Canon and Panasonic uses a lot more requirements s.den Calculator provides.
If your calculator (and the software) and accordingly looks, certainly not a problem.
Such differences, you should in any case take into account and in your influence with decision-making, if the work should be fun.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
@ Rolf
If you just so "rumfilmen" want is certainly not a bad camera.
If you want to cut s.Computer but you must also note that Sonyein different profiles as Canon and Panasonic uses a lot more requirements s.den Calculator provides.
If your calculator (and the software) and accordingly looks, certainly not a problem.
Such differences, you should in any case take into account and in your influence with decision-making, if the work should be fun. You've read wrong, I'm NOT running rumfilmer but the hobby seriously, do as my nature films synonymous publicly before. Calculator and editing program to create AVCHD synonymous. Only with the camcorder-new acquisitions, because I do hold very heavy.
Gruss Rolf
Antwort von WoWu:
No, Rolf ...., I have not misunderstood, so synonymous references to the more extensive requirements.
I think an SR12 is good for rumfilmen, but what setting requirements and I've s.eine Camera, hab 'I already briefly below. Here comes the "domain of proposed 151er is more in question.
Synonymous, but I must say that I am in relation to the consumer camcorder class is not the right partner for me.
There have colleagues like Jan a lot of experience and give you secure good (best) Tips.
What I s.all these boxes have to complain, however, is that the resolution (Lens / chip) me too "fudged" and is simply to "colorful images" trimmed.
But I'm sure you'll find your camera and wish I can be just as synonymous Axel connect again, now would say ... not the camera but the cameraman makes good pictures .... that's true.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
No, Rolf ...., I have not misunderstood, so synonymous references to the more extensive requirements.
I think an SR12 is good for rumfilmen, but what setting requirements and I've s.eine Camera, hab 'I already briefly below. Here comes the "domain of proposed 151er is more in question.
Synonymous, but I must say that I am in relation to the consumer camcorder class is not the right partner for me.
There have colleagues like Jan a lot of experience and give you secure good (best) Tips.
What I s.all these boxes have to complain, however, is that the resolution (Lens / chip) me too "fudged" and is simply to "colorful images" trimmed.
But I'm sure you'll find your camera and wish I can be just as synonymous Axel connect again, now would say ... not the camera but the cameraman makes good pictures .... that's true. Thank you for all your comments, great forum. Now I just need someone to find me my 2 GS 400 buy.
Best regards Rolf
