Frage von eagle ray:
hallo its professionals,
I would have given some s.videorohmaterial (dv-avi, 576x720), the reproducing s.pc I further wish to monitor - I'm working with Premiere Elements 3.0. some data should already be there, but not too much. above all, I would not fencing panels or comb effect at faster movements. audio is rather incidental.
1) what codec or what setting in premiere would you recommend?
my previous attempt with mpeg2, only for super dvd or tv.
with the setting "multimedia" the visual results were very unsatisfactory.
2.) or would it be better just to cut premiere and the rest with zb. VirtualDub to make me synonymous with the more codecs available to it?
3) probably a stupid beginner question: my source material is actually non-interlaced or? or do I de-interlace it for the pc issue?
many times already, thanks for your help
ray
Antwort von thos-berlin:
If your DV source material, it is interlaced (PAL TV standard)
Antwort von StefanS:
I am not in professional truly addressed, but if it really only and exclusively for the PC should be, then I would use wmv.
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von Markus:
1) what codec or what setting in premiere would you recommend? For capturing and editing select a DV / PAL Project, so that initially the full quality is maintained. The final export should be in DV-AVI format done.
2.) or would it be better just to cut premiere and the rest with zb. ... ... the Windows Media Encoder to make. The tip with the WMV format, I agree, if the video file only s.Computer play.
3) [...] my source material is actually non-interlaced or? or do I de-interlace it for the pc issue? Have you filmed a progressive or "quite normal" (interlaced)? If you s.PC Monitor Interlace-stripe look, the video must be deinterlaced. That you can with the Windows Media Encoder to make. At the same time you should see on the image to think about, because computational times, in what ratio to 720 to 576 pixels. ;-)
Cross-reference:
4:3 or 5:4
Antwort von eagle ray:
hi markus,
you and all others thanks for the info.
to pts 2:
you think of this tool so I suppose: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/de/9series/encoder/default.aspx and not the wmv encoder, which premiere elements "incorporated" is? why not?
to pts 3:
Although it sounds silly, but I honestly do not. movies I do not very often and I can not really remember that one with my cam could set something (a panasonic nv-gs120eg, about 3 years old).
the original dv-avi s.pc monitor looks perfect, no stripes, only through conversion try with different codecs (mpeg1 +2, just wmv and synonymous-ährm-divx ...) accounted for the effects noticeable comb.
ok, and image size to 768x576 thus change, right?
lg, ray
Antwort von Markus:
to pts 2:
you think of this tool so I suppose: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/de/9series/encoder/default.aspx Just that if the export option of PE provides the same, you can use the course synonymous. I believe myself but to remember s.eine discussion, where the quality is not so great was because the internal tool has no deinterlacing. The WME offers so all the necessary settings, you can still easily overlook. - Maybe you try both ways out times and then share our findings with you?
to pts 3:
Although it sounds silly, but I honestly do not. The GS120 is not likely to have progressive recording, so your material is interlaced before (bottom field first).
the original dv-avi s.pc monitor looks perfect, no stripes, only through conversion try with different codecs [...] made the comb noticeable effects. Statement:
Strip at capturing ok, and image size to 768x576 thus change, right? Right. :-)
Antwort von eagle ray:
thanks for the info!
yes right there waiting for me at work ;-)
Antwort von eagle ray:
again many thanks! habs just with the encoder wm-tested funzt it very well, no more ridges, bild quali despite significant data reduction is very high. just takes a little coding, but what cares.
beautiful day yet
ray
