Frage von Larez:
Hello,
Seeking filmmakers who have experience with the various Weitwinkelvorsätzen made for the FX1.
1. the official converter:
http://www.dnet24.de/xt/product_info.php?ref=53&products_id=0000000616450
2. Noname one of ebay.de:
http://cgi.ebay.de/72mm-0-6x-WEITWINKEL-Makro-f-SONY-CANON-PANASONIC_W0QQitemZ5881570027QQcategoryZ18612QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
3. Noname one of ebay usa:
http://cgi.ebay.de/72MM-0-5X-WIDE-ANGLE-LENS-MACRO-FOR-SONY-VCL-HG0872_W0QQitemZ7599521408QQcategoryZ64327QQssPageNameZWD2VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
In particular I would be interested in the quality of each adapter, and whether any of the converter can achieve almost fish-eye effects!?
Thank you in advance & greetings,
Larez.
Antwort von Nico A.:
Hey! gibs do not respond? The Case I would be synonymous Interesi times!
Antwort von r.p. television:
Hello.
Also with the in-house Sony Converter s.der FX1, I've achieved very good results. No vignetting, no edge blurring and chromatic aberration are not synonymous with no more than converters.
A Fish-Eye is a long but not, but simply a good wide angle. The converter has only a factor 0.8. A Fisheye really 0,4-0,3.
If you are looking for a fisheye, I would take the Raynox FE-180 Pro. See Raynox Page. He's adapted very well and synonymous s.The FX1.
However, you can through the Fisheye Converter durchzoomen not fully synonymous, and he vignetted probably quite easily in the lowest focal.
The Raynox does, I think about 500 Euros.
I would but you still (or additional) MF recommend the Sony converter. Because you can not always need to deliver such a distorted picture a la fisheye but still low focal lengths.
In addition, the included Calyx-Sunshade is very practical and functional.
On the other converter I can only say so much:
Of me I can show them to my dealer, because he bought it to show his customers what a scrap it.
Immense edge blurring. When Durchzoomen the Picture is milky. Vignetting and increased CA.
You can shoot through a bottle bottom synonymous. Hands off!
Antwort von Nico A.:
Hey!
Thx for the quick infos! times will investigate some models of the two above!
are with the other converter eg the Raynox meant! I mean the costs synonymous times Euronen his 400?
is really so bad?
Need to stop filming the climb was too.
drann there is usually one nearby and it was everything in the picture!
Thx
Nico www.Boulderholics.de
Antwort von r.p. television:
No, the Raynox Fisheye is a very good and much cheaper than the synonymous of Fisheye Century, which can do nothing better - tend to be worse.
If YOU specifically looking for a fisheye that is the best choice.
In a normal wide-angle converter, I would recommend you to Sonyfür of 600 Euros. So I see no visible difference to the Century 0.8 can. And it costs so the 1000, --
With your hands off, I mean the Ebay offerings.
Antwort von Rainer Mueller:
Hi,
you can only recommend Century. Habe nen ne F1X with:
Century Wide Angle Lens
from the PRO-Series
VS-07CV-HDS 0.7X
Synonymous've tried everything and am s.der FX7 synonymous since landed at Century.
The entire area can be durchgezoomt WW.
Have synonymous to the other tested low-cost area. Everything in the WW area and Tonnenförige cushion distortion.
Who ne Top Cam s.WW intent should nich save.
www.pictureland.de
Since you will advise best.
Gruss
rainer Muller
Antwort von r.p. television:
Did not he know that there is a synonymous 0.7 Converter for the FX1.
The wide angle is preferable because of better performance then, of course.
But do not buy all Century products without reservation. Not all are as good as its reputation. The best way to test well and (at the edge blur is synonymous with Century already happened to me back). Since $ 1,000 is just too expensive.
Antwort von Nico A.:
I will then save a little time!
but super infos thank you!
Antwort von Gerd Transetter:
There is now the new Raynox HDP-6000. Diverses've already read about it, but no user info.
http://raynox.co.jp/german/video/hdp6000ex/index.htm
Gruss
Gerd
