Frage von Saftsack:
Hello ...
Do swirl and soon a music video and want me prior schonmal prepare so that I will not s.Drehtag like a complete idiot standing there ... : D
Wollner in the video with a lot of work that is de depth background or blur the whole picture, for example, for half a second / cast can be blurred ...
how do I do that s.besten and what should I pay attention so that nothing goes wrong?
are there any tricks and gimmicks?
Thanks guys
Antwort von Bernd E.:
How do you get a small depth of field, I had to talk together written http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=461318 # 461 318
Antwort von domain:
Knowledge is worth possibly synonymous, that the human eye has about one focal of 23 mm, that is really no essential increase in image blur or blur of house offers. It is only the brain with its concentration and extraction efficiency to him significantly erscheindenden details.
The dissolution of längerbrennweitige optics is known as a possibility only been about 100 years and of course that was an exciting affair and was operated specifically in amateur clubs then synonymous excessively.
I personally have never worked so, but much more common with the one that is contrary with extreme wide-angle lenses. And if a detachment of decency, it was more neutral with deliberately selected and unstructured background designs and max. 90 mm Focal.
This perspective often lengthy search for new videos from me is all. It can often take minutes to days and before many meters and back and sides and back and forth and the light waiting until the right moment has come (see Rolf).
Can this wait can take 50% of rotation time on documentaries in stock, or rather, much, much more so.
Is there such a thing today at all impatient for Hopp Hopp-Youtube-amateurs?
Everything must go quickly at maximum darkness and without any idea of Kadrage and the magic of glorious bright light.
As currently assessed and is filmed, we go to meet the dark ages, but we are actually beings of light and no olm :-)
Antwort von rush:
Knowledge is worth possibly synonymous, that the human eye has about one focal of 23 mm, that is really no essential increase in image blur or blur of house offers. It is only the brain with its concentration and extraction efficiency to him significantly erscheindenden details.
The dissolution of längerbrennweitige optics is known as a possibility only been about 100 years and of course that was an exciting affair and was operated specifically in amateur clubs then synonymous excessively.
I personally have never worked so, but much more common with the one that is contrary with extreme wide-angle lenses. And if a detachment of decency, it was more neutral with deliberately selected and unstructured background designs and max. 90 mm Focal.
This perspective often lengthy search for new videos from me is all. It can often take minutes to days and before many meters and back and sides and back and forth and the light waiting until the right moment has come (see Rolf).
Can this wait can take 50% of rotation time on documentaries in stock, or rather, much, much more so.
Is there such a thing today at all impatient for Hopp Hopp-Youtube-amateurs?
Everything must go quickly at maximum darkness and without any idea of Kadrage and the magic of glorious bright light.
As currently assessed and is filmed, we go to meet the dark ages, but we are actually beings of light and no olm :-) Ejejej ... ;) Nu times not even like the devil s.die wall * gg *
The problem of today or the difference at that time is partly in the fact that today a lot is possible, which years ago would have been impossible without additional light ...
Which of course does not automatically means that it is the optimum ... On the contrary. By simply adding the current technical capabilities with targeted lichtsezung - then we've also wonderful image results.
And not every "hop, hop-Youtube amateur" is synonymous to understand and discuss in detail ... And one probably. synonymous a good thing;)
