Frage von Harti:
Hi,
I have times a question:
The XH A1 in HDV is yes, so 1440x1080, 1920x1080 was then expected to be high.
In the test, it is quite forward, especially as far as sharpness is concerned. Does that mean they propose other synonymous Full Hd Cams, which include native 1920x1080?
Many greetings,
Mark
PS: One dealer told me that it could be (just a guess its part), which is a successor model at the Cebit and that would then perhaps the price falls.
Do you know what it?
Antwort von smooth-appeal:
Against a good full-HD cameras (and by that I do not necessarily reflect the EX-1) stinks fully from the A1. These are synonymous but other Preisgefilde to which we would then move.
The material is not übrigends extrapolated to 1920. 1440x1080 is the output format.
Antwort von Harti:
The output format is in 4:3?
Antwort von vidwalter:
If a rectangular (superscript) 1440x1080 pixels and saved in the output endzerrt, in square pixels 1920x1080 output.
Regards
Antwort von Markus:
... with a pixel aspect ratio of 1,33:1 -> which gives you 16:9.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Mark
FullHD heist is not that it is 1920x1080 act.
The industry would like to know just like to believe.
Consequently, many of these cameras synonymous nothing s.1440 raus ... thus synonymous explains the small difference, because real 1920 is significantly better .... I can assure you from my own intuition say.
What 1440 is concerned, no preference, as it is treated, whether the record or in the presentation ... Not only are the interpolations on the appropriate screen size and the strain from the anamorph out there are just fewer details than in a native 1920 format.
And with the 4:3, you have right of course, because this is the origin profiles.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
FullHD heist is not that it is 1920x1080 act. But, they say. A camcorder with the FullHD advertised can be found in this Resolutionaufnehmen.
The exciting question is whether one sees something like this - and there have so far published models of Panasonic and JVC yes rather disappointed.
Antwort von Axel:
FullHD heist is not that it is 1920x1080 act.
But, they say. A camcorder with the FullHD advertised can be found in this Resolutionaufnehmen.
The exciting question is whether one sees something like this - and there have so far published models of Panasonic and JVC yes rather disappointed. The same applies to FullHD Television. The label alone says nothing about the picture, please check yourself.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Axel @ Quadruplex
That is unfortunately not correct.
FullHD is a marketing designation of the
European Information, Communications and Consumer Electronics Technology Industry Association (http://www.eicta.org/) was released and merely states that the devices marked with a signal or output s.Ein can circumvent the highest current Resolutionentspricht. As the signal is generated is not said. Therefore we see no difference synonymous, because it is not generated in 1920.
The last signal was technically defined HDready.
FullHD EICTA is of the very consciously as a "free defierendes seal" was issued.
This can be anything in the EICTA read.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
FullHD is a marketing designation of the European Information, Communications and Consumer Electronics Technology Industry Association (http://www.eicta.org/) was released and merely states that the devices marked with a signal or output s.Ein can circumvent You're sure that you you do not confuse with HDReady?
This can be anything in the EICTA read. Would you have a link? On the fast can I find on the (not clear) Page nix - and their search logs to "FullHD" null hit :-(
Antwort von WoWu:
is the top ... but I look after the detail link ...
Yes, I do not confuse this because, as I wrote HDready was the last really technically defined format!
Since all recommendations are just marketing babble.
Antwort von Axel:
@ Wolfgang:
Misunderstanding. I felt exactly the same. A FullHD TV
can have a bad picture, because what shabby tricks always synonymous.
