Frage von HD-MAX:
Hello,
since about two months so you can clip on YouTube as MP4 in 720p Upload and with the simple "hack" & fmt = 22 "in HD considered synonymous.
This hack is recently no longer necessary. YOUTUBE has made some clips available in HD now added a link with the man directly to the HD version of the clip can be accessed:
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=XCik8RjOCrk
If you click on this link HD to get the clip in HD and almost twice as large.
This clip is now running smoothly, however, you need a fat DSL line and a quick calculator.
Endlich takes YOUTUBE farewell of the fuzzy time and 4:3 gives us the possibility of our movies in full quality on show.
Antwort von Ficeduld:
... was here but have long discussed and videos in 720p could be a long time to upload ......
Antwort von HD-MAX:
The "HD" button right below the video is new and it means you are now officially synonymous YT (without the "HACK") HD video upload and may be considered.
Antwort von maxi62:
Which format should it be so precisely HD button appears?
Must MPEG4?
Is not MPEG2 in 1024x576?
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Which format should it be so precisely HD button appears?
Must MPEG4?
Is not MPEG2 in 1024x576? 1024x576 is not HD, but SD equalized. I would say, 1280x720p in MPEG4 / H.264 is not the worst approach. And experience shows that the AAC does not sound at 64kBit below, otherwise the HQ mode is not activated.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
.......
Endlich takes YOUTUBE farewell of the fuzzy time and 4:3 gives us the possibility of our movies in full quality on show. Aha - that everything was in 4:3 so blurred? Un in HD now everything is better yes? Is interesting to know times.
I would say who is good raw material in 320x240, the convert was not synonymous fuzzy things to complain. Oh yeah ... who of course, Youtube clips on 24 "monitor when watching the aufbläst is probably your own fault - so does that mean yes synonymous mice cinema.
Actually never NEN GBA PSP PDA or iPod movie seen?
Antwort von maxi62:
Material I have only 720x576 (16:9).
I habs to 1280x720 and then scaled as Mpeg4 uploaded! Works wonderfully, is now synonymous HD button there. Looks far better than before!
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Material I have only 720x576 (16:9).
I habs to 1280x720 and then scaled as Mpeg4 uploaded! Works wonderfully, is now synonymous HD button there. Looks far better than before! Totally sick. Since it is only after HD scaling it so that YouTube finally reasonably represent SD.
Antwort von maxi62:
Totally sick. Since it is only after HD scaling it so that YouTube finally reasonably represent SD. Yes the road is a bit strange - but at least it works well! File is in MPEG4 format even significantly smaller than the small PAL format in MPEG2.
Antwort von deti:
It remains only to mention that it eg with Netbook CPU and other poor computers is almost impossible to smooth the benefit of HD on YouTube to come.
Deti
Antwort von maxi62:
It remains only to mention that it eg with Netbook CPU and other poor computers is almost impossible to smooth the benefit of HD on YouTube to come.
Deti True, this is an important point. Many of the currently widespread Calculator HD button can not yet use.
Antwort von tillbaer:
Just as it is synonymous to me. Net I always go with the oldest of my calculator and the Netbook synonymous jerky without end. Therefore, I look back now almost invariably Vimeo.
Antwort von maxi62:
Vimeo now I would be uncertain. One never knows how long it is the Page, as much resources as Google should simply not have.
Moreover, the Vimeo Page awfully confusing and caused me to browser error.
Then rather than 1024x720 at Youtupe upload, then there are at least the "High Resolution" button. The Netbook is synonymous with.
Antwort von maxi62:
But HD is already not bad.
See the test video with cheap camera apitek ahd200 in HD:
Antwort von Moritzk:
Hello,
So a first test video in HD, I have uploaded to Youtube, but I have chosen the setting 1280x720 (I hope that's true now).
Well no preference, in any case has super geklappt.
Now I have another test video, this slightly more than 6 minutes long. If I get this now in the "Youtube format umwandele, I come to a size of about 1.2 Gb. That means there are 200 mb too much to upload it to Youtube.
Where can I get a little slimming but still upload in HD?
Many thanks and greetings from Wismar
Antwort von RickyMartini:
1.2 GB - the Ho Waldfee - these
are 200MB/min! This is probably a bit too much of a good thing! ;)
At 1280x720 maximum 7Mbit / s required - but you've just 27Mbit / s, more than HDV level!
What codec did you used?
Antwort von techman:
True, this is an important point. Many of the currently widespread Calculator HD button can not yet use. Will probably be the case, but on my editing machine (of the times the internet was, exceptionally, to update yourself) see the HD Youtube film really good. With 3GB of RAM and 2x3Ghz flick synonymous nothing ;-) but was synonymous not only to be expected ...
Antwort von Moritzk:
1.2 GB - the Ho Waldfee - these are 200MB/min!
This is probably a bit too much of a good thing! ;)
At 1280x720 maximum 7Mbit / s required - but you've just 27Mbit / s, more than HDV level!
What codec did you used? Ui yes then this is probably quite a lot.
So I did the film with Magix Video Pro x uncompressed exports to quality losses zuvermeiden. The uncompressed movie had a size of 60 gb, now I have the movie with super in MPEG-4 1280x720 converted ... just like the Youtube HD format is the standard?
What is wrong ... certainly at the top.
Regards
Antwort von RickyMartini:
1.2 GB - the Ho Waldfee - these are 200MB/min!
This is probably a bit too much of a good thing! ;)
At 1280x720 maximum 7Mbit / s required - but you've just 27Mbit / s, more than HDV level!
What codec did you used?
Ui yes then this is probably quite a lot.
So I did the film with Magix Video Pro x uncompressed exports to quality losses zuvermeiden. The uncompressed movie had a size of 60 gb, now I have the movie with super in MPEG-4 1280x720 converted ... just like the Youtube HD format is the standard?
What is wrong ... certainly at the top.
Regards Let the Resolutionund the codec but imagine 7Mbit / s data rate at the video one.
Do not forget that you s.None film production work, but only s.ollem amateur stuff, which is on youtube no one itches, when the third left pixel in the top of the eighth row is not colorfast! ;)
You must be due to compression losses are not the same panic and uncompressed output - your plate is for you 167MB / s unlikely to allow a smooth playback! ;)
Antwort von Moritzk:
1.2 GB - the Ho Waldfee - these are 200MB/min!
This is probably a bit too much of a good thing! ;)
At 1280x720 maximum 7Mbit / s required - but you've just 27Mbit / s, more than HDV level!
What codec did you used?
Ui yes then this is probably quite a lot.
So I did the film with Magix Video Pro x uncompressed exports to quality losses zuvermeiden. The uncompressed movie had a size of 60 gb, now I have the movie with super in MPEG-4 1280x720 converted ... just like the Youtube HD format is the standard?
What is wrong ... certainly at the top.
Regards
Let the Resolutionund the codec but imagine 7Mbit / s data rate at the video one.
Do not forget that you s.None film production work, but only s.ollem amateur stuff, which is on youtube no one itches, when the third left pixel in the top of the eighth row is not colorfast! ;)
You must be due to compression losses are not the same panic and uncompressed output - your plate is for you 167MB / s unlikely to allow a smooth playback! ;) Okay okay as far as everything, but where can I get into the settings on 7Mbit / s change?
(See Still Image)
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Hi Moritzk.
Under "bitrate" video, you can now enter 7000 and test whether the hinhaut really synonymous. :)
Antwort von Moritzk:
Hi Moritzk.
Under "bitrate" video, you can now enter 7000 and test whether the hinhaut really synonymous. :) But I do have now is 1008th .. but less than 7000 or do I :-) wiedermal it not?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Hi Moritzk.
Under "bitrate" video, you can now enter 7000 and test whether the hinhaut really synonymous. :)
But I do have now is 1008th .. but less than 7000 or do I :-) wiedermal it not? 1008kbps would be a 50MB file size with just produce, leading to a strong Artefaktierung the picture would lead, as the data led to the image would be much too low.
Try it out with 7000kbps. :)
Antwort von Moritzk:
Hi Moritzk.
Under "bitrate" video, you can now enter 7000 and test whether the hinhaut really synonymous. :)
But I do have now is 1008th .. but less than 7000 or do I :-) wiedermal it not?
1008kbps would be a 50MB file size with just produce, leading to a strong Artefaktierung the picture would lead, as the data led to the image would be much too low.
Try it out with 7000kbps. :) So therefore I have a video with those settings uploaded, but unfortunately the video is not shown in HD. I can see in bad quality, but the HD button missing.
It takes a while to Youtube the video in HD displays, or is it s.mir?
Regards
Antwort von Marco:
Adjusting the Youtube page at times in English.
Marco
Antwort von Moritzk:
Adjusting the Youtube page at times in English.
Marco Changes unfortunately still nothing.
Is it not perhaps be that the HD processing takes a little Youtube?
Antwort von Moritzk:
Adjusting the Youtube page at times in English.
Marco
Changes unfortunately still nothing!
Is it not perhaps be that the HD processing takes a little Youtube? So in other words somehow has "Super" my video in the wrong size so detects exported ... Youtube video is not synonymous than HD. So the whole :-( nochmal irgendwann klappt it.
Antwort von Moritzk:
Adjusting the Youtube page at times in English.
Marco
Changes unfortunately still nothing!
Is it not perhaps be that the HD processing takes a little Youtube?
So in other words somehow has "Super" my video in the wrong size so detects exported ... Youtube video is not synonymous than HD. So the whole :-( nochmal irgendwann klappt it. So now it finally works ... So who can be like my little test video gladly look at it.
