Frage von Eisenhower:
Hi Everybody,
I was here in the forum but could read the correct information for me not yet put together coherently. Currently, I own Canon MV600 MiniDV. Since I am strengthen the area WebTV and DVD will be embarking, ie films under the studio will produce conditions (lighting, constant conditions), I would like a new growth. Powerful PC for postprocessing, microwave, mixer, etc. are available.
It is important for me to easily follow the material with flashes of banners, text. The resulting picture is at eye level with videos of Mirror Online, time and other premium online service providers are. I shall to the extent the questions:
1) Is an HD-capable or useful, I have increased expenditures
in the post? Is the HD-Resolutionfür WebTV / DVD absolutely necessary?
2) As a storage media, I prefer SD cards or hard drive, says something about it?
3) My price range is around 1,000 euros for the Camera - realistic in my requirements?
4) I want to be simple picture of recorded material to the finished product come. What editing software allows me to do that in high quality - no big conversions. Output format should RealPlayer and Windows Media support.
Perhaps that one with a 600 Euro camera under studio conditions get a comparable picture quality, I can not stop to assess. I would be happy about answers, maybe someone of the same requirements and has experience.
Many thanks
Eisenhower
Antwort von WideScreen:
Hi
I would take an SD camera with firewire out. Then AP LOCATION ON and thus the data directly to disk storage.
With AP you can CS4 directly in Flash synonymous off.
When would I use a camera when I take everything on manual can provide. Perhaps a VX1000 and VX21000? (Could even with errors in Tapeteil have.) The sound from the audio directly to Auspegeln IN the camera, so you immediately with the stream in it.
All this of course only if you have only one camera .....
Antwort von Eisenhower:
Well, it should have a new device. The costs go beyond the company should hold in the framework of ¬ 1,000 to stay. I've seen that pretty much any current editing software output internet-compatible formats. To do this I would have one question: is the resulting quality of the conversion of AVCHD in an Internet format better or worse than if I have an SD source format take?
Gruss
OneSeat
Antwort von WideScreen:
1000 euro is holding ned much for Camera and editing software.
Internet format? What is it? Gibts da ne norm? Din Iso?
Antwort von Eisenhower:
With the Internet I thought MOV formats, WMF, FLV and RM. And the question as to whether or not there in these formats play a role if I was an HD or SD use. Always under the condition that I have good, stable environments in the rotation have (light, sound).
I thought zBseinen Panasonic HDC-SD200 or SD20.
Antwort von nachtspion:
@ Eisenhower:
I think we belong to a guild are not yet properly understood:) I think I know what you want to make, at least I like before.
Many here in the forum will give you tips you can not do because they have very different requirements than "we." The VX2100 is from her oversized price. The price / performance ratio is bad (synonymous needed) if you have a WebTV Channel want to make as described.
If you're really always in the studio working conditions, I think you will come out very well with the 1,000 euros. I would advise you to switch to HD. The reason is that even now many video sites (YouTube, Vimeo, sevenload) HD support and you almost real Internet Television semiprofessionelen at high levels could make.
I habs with Vimeo tested. Laptop Television s.den connected to full umgeschalten, geniales Picture. Full screen on a monitor with the Resolution1200x1024, perfect!
And believe me, if you are not a lot of money for their own server infrastructure have left, you need to use such services if you just want to make nearly professional. WebTV traffic and bandwidth needs.
At least I've always kept in mind that Internet content very soon on the normal TV can be streamed. Be it through a miniPC or integrated hardware. Even when times MediaMarkt compatriots how much tube TV still exist? You can assume that in 10 years None is more a home has. With HD you invest so synonymous in the future.
Conclusion: Yes, HD is necessary!
The camera you've chosen I think is identical with the HDC SD300 except the 200 has less control. Since the SD300 but with very good light images, it probably makes good. To mention are the HF100/10, HF11 or HG20/21 of Canon, which produce very good pictures. The HF100 comes for about 580 ¬.
As software, I recommend Sony Vegas 8th This ran in my native AVCHD editing problems. You've written that you have a powerful PC did.
Antwort von Eisenhower:
@ night spion
I think your tip towards HD is correct. In the near future we will be a convergence of media, I insofernbin future proof with HD set. You seem so knowing what I want and maybe the people here are rather classic film, with the video on the Web is not very much can begin. Thanks for the tip with the Canon. I will be the Panasonic and the Canon as synonymous in the Choice draw closer. As a PC, I have a machine with 4GB, 1TB hard drive with 64mb cache and an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 CPU (P45 chipset). That should be performant enough.
Regards
Eisenhower
Antwort von nachtspion:
@ night spion
You seem so knowing what I want and maybe the people here are rather classic film, with the video on the Web is not very much can begin. I make videos for a long time network (2005). In planning is now a regional channel / news site with video contributions. The requirements here are not holding as high as with a TV transmitter. In Slashcam but apparently there are professionals who can not do anything with it that I do not need to EX1 for the web professionally producing.
Sometimes I think the media revolution is silently s.einigen over. Consumers migrate to the Web all the s.and not notice it:)
The consumer is synonymous with the image quality is not as picky as many filmmakers always think. Content is king! And those ideals Consumercams lighting conditions at a very good Picture deliver. A Normalo sees no difference as to a more expensive camera to 10x.
Your PC is Identical with my, you allowed with the AVCHD files in the current Flash Cams easily cope.
Antwort von WideScreen:
I think the problem is rather the same is called content. Many broadcasters send WEB halt .... to say the garbage. The statement "It can not look" is unfortunately often the only thing that remains. Since we penultimate year with the WEB TV times even considering we quickly came to the conclusion that the synonymous not financially viable. Especially not if one wants to live like this. And with amateurish zusammengeschusterten contributions, I believe it is even less a chance. The oh-so-much acclaimed Internet MUNICIPALITY is yes or no. Each "tinkers" for themselves. If there are times but at least a "merger" of TV makers were, a community of interests, the synonymous advertising and Page has a joint, then you are in the chaos of "stations" synonymous easier, and thus interest arousal. Because if you just "send" do for "people like you," then that is probably very naive. It is not 1000 but hundreds of thousands of spectators need. Zaatoo makes it quite correctly. Sowas but for web-TV. And not that I always new when switching URLs must click.
There are certainly good articles and content on the Web, no question, but how can I work for a websender if there is no money there? And on all the videos: "Here is my grandmother and my Pappa as swimming in the Adriatic ..." it surely has no pedestal.
Money comes only through sponsorship and advertising revenue purely, and who is doing advertising on his station guckt None. And the time I do everything for Lau is over ...... my landlord wants to be synonymous Money ....
As long as there is no Serious WebTV suppliers, this is just what a few. (and 1000 is of little people). To be serious, you need capital to equal the right to start. Even if one sends only 3 hr per day (which I do not as a serious channel "would describe) one set of people employed full time. And interesting contributions are not alone in the studio.
Antwort von nachtspion:
@ widescreen:
Since you have absolutely right. But the community you ansprichst there are already sufficient. Videos on the Web have been around longer, but youtube only (the community) has made it acceptable, because suddenly a lot of video on a platform is found. The ever increasing bandwidth available to you has to pay again and to accelerate significantly the development of the Internet at. I my me, there are now 50,000 with VDSL Kbit / s.
What is clear is on youtube 99% scrap, but the 1% enough for me to see it to love. Look at how video portals on Sevenload. There are divisions / groups and some of the "Channel Format". Ehrensenf synonymous is a good example of mass entertainment via Web video.
If you are a little recherchierst, the media and dying (in the first moment only newspapers) in the U.S. is it possible, then shows you what the television in 10 years blooms, if not sooner.
Versteh not misunderstand me, the television, it will probably always happen, but the relevance in 10 years is much lower than the Web.
The web is changing consumer behavior. Recently, a study revealed that the generation of 13-30 years more time spent on the Internet than in front of the television, not to mention the reading habits (who buys a newspaper?).
The Web is the small chance of a real revolution to start. The big ones can almost do not mind.
If it is properly in place, it is not difficult to a regional multimedia offering to tie up by the price-performance ratio is unbeatable. What is feasible with the Web:
- News
- Information on regional events / events / Cultural
- Webradio Sender
- Webfernsehen / Video Posts
- Communication
These are all things that today across different media (TV-Sender/Radiosender/Zeitungen / "postal") are distributed, the Web combines everything together and makes the contents of long-lived, as they normally do not canceled. But what is on television or radio is sent away. All extra or want to record can not be many.
There is the first car, the Internet-are just as TVs, the contents of this show. This is all still in its infancy, but it is our behavior as we know it completely upside down. I am no longer s.die bound frequencies of the car, I can in the future, my special interest channels (Hiphop / Rock / Techno etc.) in Tumbuktu listen. Bollywood runs on television, streamed directly from India ...
The web allows any multimedia, a separate transmitter to be, and all for very little startup capital. If you have a regional reach a certain size, you can synonymous earn enough money so. The error of many is that they want to be happy Pro7. Better first one is just a small regional stations, and works of the municipality to municipality. Then it all makes sense synonymous and future.
Who sites like digg.com or yigg.de knows how to do it in the future, the content can be found. Users recommend the next content current and / or good. So we filter out the scrap. This is synonymous to the reason why Microsoft necessarily a major search engine providers want to be. The future of the Web lies in the search engines.
Edit: Look at times on the site http://www.madeinmtl.com. A really well done on Page Montreal. With the traditional media is something not even imaginable!
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... If it is properly in place, it is not difficult to a regional multimedia offering to tie up by the price-performance ratio is unbeatable. What is feasible with the Web News ... ... information on regional events / events / regional Kulturelles...Wenn you reach a certain size, you can synonymous earn enough money so that ... A large number of newspapers offering exactly this service in the form of local video news (of a very simple to quite elaborate production) has been around for years on their websites. At one point, the publishers of experience agree: so far and still synonymous in the foreseeable future is a service to readers / viewers, the cost of money and none involved. If you have a video news've developed, with the actual money to earn, then you could certainly just good marketing of his life.
Antwort von nachtspion:
This is a problem with the big publishers have always struggled to be. They are holding the "real" journalists, the cost accordingly synonymous.
I take as an example again, the U.S., because Germany are always a bit behind. There, publishers increasingly bigger problems with the blog to compete. Blogger, the messages often faster / more recently in the network as a newspaper. The aircraft crashed into the Hudson River a few weeks ago as was first reported in Twitter, long before the first news editors have been pointed out. Also, the first images of them existed in the blogosphere. The blogs are synonymous there a growing role.
One can assume that in the blog editors laity sit not even a fraction of the cost of what a journalist is expected.
The consumer, however, it is wurscht of whom he's getting his info. If I produce video contributions, I do the layman as synonymous, because I have a completely different profession learned. If I now create a quality produce that someone in front of the monitor can not detect whether it comes from the professional or amateur filmmaker, I have won.
I do not say that I can, but it can be a lot of people out there which have never had the chance to show their talents!
As I said, s.Ende it is only important a medium to have the whole good snippets together into a whole. At the moment it is google, of coming back angerauscht sites like digg.com (USA) or yigg.de. More will follow ...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... This is a problem with the big publishers have always struggled to be. They are holding the "real" journalists, the cost accordingly synonymous ... There are newspapers, which its free Video News of employees (which in this case means something like "everyone who is in a position, an on and off the lens cap") to create the raw material and completely unprocessed online. As do the direct cost of production in very narrow limits - but the audience probably synonymous, and on top of you ruined it with a "quality" even the reputation of the printed product. As homepage Hobbyist, which is no need to take and also have a bread profession, it was on this point obviously easier.
... If I now create a quality produce that someone in front of the monitor can not detect whether it comes from the professional or amateur filmmaker, I won ... At first glance, yes. Really, you have won, only if you with your job and its environment can generate sufficient revenue to cover all enterprises in an economically viable stand-alone basis. I wish you - honesty - good luck with this!
Antwort von Eisenhower:
Rein with WebTV as is currently offered to earn money is difficult if not impossible synonymous. But there are in the area of video and Internet much more s.Anwendungen. More I would not say, not too much of my idea to betray. First, Thanks for your replies, will give me a HD growth. Incidentally, today wished the stupid market advice - you can forget it. The did not know something about the format.
Gruss
Eisenhower
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Uh - there are usually synonymous only "employees". Say people who help you in a box to put the car, get advice in specialist and expert forums.
That should have been known.
Those who still did not know is your own fault.
It is this factor more fun to treat yourself if you want to want to see faces questioning, but this is quite common. ;-)
But is (mostly) with all sorts of shops are not so "Fachbezogene" goods.
MfG
B. DeKid
PS: We are due to synonymous stories already nem Toys r Us store flown because we skateboard / BMX times tested;-P
Antwort von WideScreen:
@ widescreen:
Since you have absolutely right. But the community you ansprichst there are already sufficient. Videos on the Web have been around longer, but youtube only (the community) has made it acceptable, ........
What is clear is on youtube 99% scrap, but the 1% enough for me to see it to love. You I'm talking here not of Youtube and consorts but of genuine WEB TV. So, online television and not ne simple web page with videos. And since there is no community. Or is there an association of people WebTV? No, at least I do not know. That is why I find it not as a community. But each manufacturer WebTV tinkers to himself, and tries to market itself. Every other competitor is and must be destroyed. Sure is synonymous with the "normal" TV so, but at least are the organized and you know how to receive and what they can and send it next. A switch is possible and important. Could not even switch None but would look more TV. All this goes on WEB TV not, or only very mühseelig. As I said, Zaatoo is already on the right away, or even hardware, such as the boxes of Maxdome or T-Online.
I like youtube synonymous for his important contributions as you can, but I do not see this as a WEB TV rather than video archive:))
Antwort von ap-film:
This idea with WebTV, I already had 2003 times - but I am with this idea anywhere abgeblitzt because I was ahead of my vision .....
If one looks today, every newspaper has already run their own clips. The question is what do I really - these days it is so that everyone wants what and ninth to earn more from what passion does.
WebTV alone to operate is net so easy - then I should - editor, cinematographer, editor, spokesperson, technicians and so on. Alone you can not create. And what is the second one - such a project can only start one of the non-reporting of actual lives. Such a project requires ambition to start and volunteers to ensure that money is earned. But as long as it does everything for free you can get the "old" rabbit for the regional or television production in provate neck.
I have all the threats and will now read my old concept vorholen again, maybe it's time to start.
Antwort von nachtspion:
@ ap-film:
Yes, it's time durchzustarten. The time is ripe. The people now have a connection to the network you need to regular images on the screen to conjure. Video portals like YouTube, Vimeo and sevenload offer you the possibility to upload HD.
The AWS services of Amazon allow you to be your own best conditions to video hosting.
Do you see something, I'm always neugiereig important to see what the people in the network so the legs are.
Antwort von WideScreen:
Time ne "silly" question:
What is WEB TV anyway? Is now live television via the Web, or an archive with clickable contributions, similar to youtube? I think I've given a different understanding than her for WEB TV. :)
