Frage von actaion:
Hello,
so far I am registered with youtube and vimeo.
Vimeo clearly better pleased with me, because
- Not so much advertising
- Design simple and pleasant, not so overloaded with killefit
- Vidoe car will not start immediately when calling, and we are equally represented in good rwuali, ohen that you only need to click HQ
- Download-possibility-of the original files.
Now, however, vimeo download the possibility of the original-files limited to 1 week. ok, would be even verschmerzbar.
But what is worse is that recently, are supported for some reason no 16:9 videos anymore!
Only 1920x1080 and 1280x720 is still supported.
Al other customary Auflsöungen so 1440x1ß80 and all the typical SD resolutions (; synonymous NTSC and PAL) neuerdinsg are generally displayed in 4:3-format. 16:9 videos will be squeezed.
Since I am in SD I have my movies videos now upscale only in 1280x720, so they are displayed in 16:9. Unfortunately, this resolution is to cut meienm program synonymous only in HDV / Mpeg2 export, resulting in file sizes of about 120MB / minute.
How do I get the filesize 2.5-fold, according to a longer upload time while maintaining quality. I also have an extra transcode the video for vimeo again ... all very annoying ...
if the change again, I would therefore like to move ...
Antwort von idolum:
Perhaps Dailymotion is worth a look.
Antwort von p@ul:
I myself have no experience so it would be vlt something for you ...
http://exposureroom.com/
Antwort von mov:
it is still synonymous blip.tv, since you have many freedoms, which remain in their original format videos for visitors to view and download available, and are synonymous converted to flash. The aspect ratio is not changed (; then, would be synonymous to receive 16:2), for any video dimensions.
Antwort von actaion:
schonmal thanks for the tips!
ExposureRoom looks at first glance quite appealing. I'll look at me on occasion times closer!
Antwort von deti:
But what is worse is that recently, are supported for some reason no 16:9 videos anymore! That's not true - there is clearly the fault with you. I uploaded a video on http://vimeo.com/5783631 with a resolution of 720x405 and guess what?
Deti
Antwort von actaion:
But what is worse is that recently, are supported for some reason no 16:9 videos anymore!
That's not true - there is clearly the fault with you. I uploaded a video on http://vimeo.com/5783631 with a resolution of 720x405 and guess what?
Deti yes, sure.
But call me once a camcorder / camera that records at 720x405!
Ich habs mal synonymous tried to convert of 720x576 to 720x405. The result is - synonymous with the same size - a much worse picture.
Antwort von deti:
yes, sure.
But call me once a camcorder / camera that records at 720x405!
Ich habs mal synonymous tried to convert of 720x576 to 720x405. The result is - synonymous with the same size - a much worse picture. Oh man, I can not believe it, then you'll just have to make draus 1024x576 - is it really so difficult to calculate a pixel aspect ratio of 1:1 at an aspect ratio of 16:9?
Deti
Antwort von Piers:
Yipieee .....
a "How I can make one PAL anamorphic 16 / 9 Picture for computer screens?" Discussion
* * popcornnehm
,-P
Antwort von actaion:
Oh man, I can not believe it, then you'll just have to make draus 1024x576
That can mean DV editing software (Corel VideoStudio latest version) but unfortunately not. Therefore, I have only 720x405. Or I take a different software and encode again, at (; with renewed) quality loss.
Clearly it is in some way, but it is with a) additional time and) b quality loss associated.
Both unnecessary and both I have not other video platforms, since they support standard PAL resolution.
Vimeo was synonymous until recently, yes. Where the meaning lies in the support for the standard PAL AND NTSC resolutions, so the two most commonly used resolutions with camcorders all over the world mark, suddenly? Raff, I do not ...
