Frage von thingol:
hello people
I myself pretty much every thread on slashcam nt pole filter, with and without combination with uv VX2100 perused, but I'm not really smart came of it - my conclusio:
hama is ok
cokin is better
namely, the question is - I want to buy a pin and uv filter --
I've looked on amazon because even taste the hama filter of some 50 - 70 ¬. and is now a linear or circular polfilter better - especially for swing?
gibts da alternative and what are the differences as well - if there is presented a Polish hama filter with another 30 ¬ with 60 ¬ - s.sich look the same only the number is different and that's it then just been synonymous.
So I should use it before I grow, I'd at least know whether I should buy myself as equal to what is right supriges otherwise the frustrating about zeugs and the money thrown away is rampant ;-)
thanks
lg
Thingol
Antwort von GhostDog:
So, for recording with the video camera, the radial polarization filter are preferable to linear, as may affect the linear focusing and the color of the TTL - systems. I may have a linear polarizer synonymous, but in my XM 1 by various manual intervention by the effects of the filter (in my cam, there are sometimes cast a red light - Stitch) counter.
Different Rates of different filtering can move her allowances, but to be synonymous anbieterbedingt. Variation of 50% by the manufacturer price for the same articles of different dealer's always there.
Gruß Frank
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
usually circular polarizing filter for Autofucus working models are thought of as may occur with a linear Scharfstellprobleme (With AF).
In Hama, or synonymous, there are several other companies allowances, which are in most filters primers.
Hama has evaporated like the more expensive the filter HTMC 8 layers in order to achieve high-quality lenses virtually no image loss eg reflections,
whether the advantage is clearly visible, everyone should decide for themselves.
When Cokin system is synonymous to the use of multiple filter the same time,
Eg a UV, the course together.
Of course, this variant is synonymous favorable, once the holder is paid to buy the relatively cheap filter cartridges.
In general, one needs only one filter, such as eg pole (Because there is installed a UV, so synonymous is a pole filters UV rays away)
Only when the filter should be absolutely neutral in color (the pole it is not), the UV ago.
If possible Blaustich synonymous can be used a skylight, which the UV else
is almost similar except that it is not neutral, therefore, a slight orange tint.
January
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
I was with Spin of Hama (and other manufacturers started), but later I switched to Cokin, weil ..
[list]
1 ... more camcorder with different Filtergewinden should use the same filter (different adapter rings, the same filter holder, the same filter)
2nd one ... s.Filtern Cokin seeeeeeehhhr Choice delivers rich
3rd ... the creative leeway with Farb-/Grauverlauffiltern (through the vertical displacement of the horizon line) better come to fruition
4th ... the filter quickly, and have expanded (no screw, just insert into the filter holder)
5th ... the price of the Cokin system is relatively cheap and
6th ... the adapter ring can be easier to resolve once seized as a Spin. List [/ u: 09fb221f74] At the VX2100 with 58 mm filter thread does the filter holder from a somewhat mikrig. For my camcorder, I have chosen the size of P (if the filter holder and a lead through its paces, I have not tried - I) both sizes.
But if you only want to use circular polarizing filter (and) no Farb-/Grauverlauffilter, then it is sufficient to Spin version of Hama. A UV filter, or perhaps you do not need to protect the camcorder lens. ;-)
Antwort von SCHWARZSEHER:
I want me to buy one for my Canon HV30 Raynox HD-6600-52 + adapter 43mm, plus a tulip. My question: I can even combine with the Cokin filter system A? I wanted to bring namely POL-and UV-filter it.
Thank you for answers ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
So if you have a WW adapter, which then forwards the said thread has a 52 mm ....( and it's not on the front glass to edge out arch Thread / stake)
Then you can unscrew the UV filter, and then make the Cokin system was only on it.
To this end, there are 52 mm adapter rings which come for Daqs Cokin or can be delivered (very cheap)
When using the polarizing filter, you take the UV filter down ..... the use of Pol Cokin Filters and I believe to be necessary or only partially realized .....
The use of a tulip (if this is a rubber or GeLi Aperture / Suns should be protected) is used with the Cokin system no longer exists.
The Cokin system acts as a quasi been such.
Pol as UV filters, it is no preference whether or not GeLi, fit the GeLi mus halt.
Alla
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... so if you have a WW adapter, which then forwards has the aforementioned 52 mm as a threaded ... This Raynox converter has a 52mm rear only, but a 72mm front thread: It separates the Cokin P-out system, which is sufficient only up to 62mm. What you need is thus at least Cokin P.
... the use of Pol Cokin Filters and I think necessary or feasible for only limited ... I think he meant the polarizer of Cokin, and of course, works flawlessly.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Bernd
Ah ok that I did not know I'm the p43 with the 72 mm s.der Cam and the 54 I'm out of my product name as a front diameter of thinking ""
Clearly then, the P system.
............
Again, I thought s.einen "pole filter" not s.den Cokin, this may indeed be synonymous with system still serves well / set.
Antwort von SCHWARZSEHER:
So I get the following: above Raynox WW, Cokin P filter holder (filter + required) + a lens hood (synonymous of Cokin - hope this is enough, and is an adequate alternative to the previously scheduled tulip)
Because the Raynox WW indeed has 72mm thread - do I need for the Cokin filter holder is not still get a adapter?
Thank you ever taken the help!
Antwort von SCHWARZSEHER:
okay - the issue with the adapter removed we habs already found.
Can anyone recommend a good POL-and UV-filter?
Thank you very much!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
I think the 72 mm ring is supplied with. Otherwise, you can buy more of the.
For one of my MF lenses I've definitely nen 77 mm adapter ring here sP system.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Can anyone recommend a good POL-and UV-filter? ... If you decide to Cokin, then take synonymous of the Cokin polarizer, because after all, he even has to fit into the filter holder. On the other hand, UV filter, I would resort to a multi-coated from a reputable manufacturer such as B + W or Heliopan.
Gruß Bernd E.
