Frage von nullkommanix:
hello dear professionals since I weitwinkel hv30 with Raynox
Use 0.66, and UV filters to aufgeschraubt have
I am constantly fighting a problem that, especially when
black areas, where the filmed, the
linse mirrored objectively, ie it appear round
objectively rings synonymous appear comical blue-colored
reflections at recording. uv-filter is on the
Raynox 0.66 on, is with the Raynox
adapters associated with the hv30.
Edit from Mod: thread under the heading "camcorder-accessories folder.
Antwort von Markus:
... since I hv30 with Raynox 0.66 wide use, and this UV filter aufgeschraubt have, I am constantly fighting a problem ... Is that
with WW-converter but
without the UV filter as synonymous? If not, you need a better UV filter s.besten several times and paid if necessary, slightly arched ( "ghostless").
Antwort von nullkommanix:
... since I hv30 with Raynox 0.66 wide use, and this UV filter aufgeschraubt have, I am constantly fighting a problem ...
Is that with WW-converter but without the UV filter as synonymous? If not, you need a better UV filter s.besten several times and paid if necessary, slightly arched ( "ghostless"). The problem comes with ww-converter, without the UV filter before the light,
with an additional UV filter (more professionally remunerated -> manufacturer)
not curved, in addition the blue artefacts
Antwort von nullkommanix:
the uv-filter makes the lentil synonymous spiegelung clearer
Antwort von Markus:
Are they
Lensflaresscattered?
Antwort von nullkommanix:
Are they Lensflares oder scattered? lensflare with tülpe here gives little help, but
remains of lentil spiegelung ww converter remains
Antwort von Markus:
If the WW-Converter is already reflected in, then you can actually do nothing other than a higher-WW-Converter only.
Antwort von Eugen von ...:
uv-filter is on the
Raynox 0.66 on, is with the Raynox
adapters associated with the hv30.
Between rings do you use to customize the thread size? If yes, what of what size ...?
Eugen
Antwort von scream:
If the 52er Raynox, then it is a 43/52 adapter ring and a 72er filter.
The HD-6600 PRO is ok and such problems, the nullkommanix seems to have, I do not know.
A few example videos would not be bad.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Nullkommanix
If the UV filter out is ... the work still does not?
And Question: Why do you use on a UV filter.
Unlike the chemical film, the image sensor in any case a very steep UV-blocking.
The only thing you like with such an additional filter can happen is that it is not so high and you are also parts of the visible spectrum cut off .... and of course these effects, if necessary
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
nullkommanix I am!
Yes, I use the intermediate rings of HV30 with Raynox 0.66
(HD-6600PRO-52) and although Soligor 43 -> 52nd
The Raynox is the Uv filter of SpiritX (mehrfachversigelt)
drauf (with 72mm).
zum Bild zum Bild Without a filter, with WW-Converter:
zum Bild With UV-filter, with WW-Converter:
(Lens is mirrored more)
zum Bild I use UV filter, because more sharpness will achieve at least some
Percent more.
With the Tülpe have tried it, the Lensflares clear away
the lens but in all cases to light.
Have intention to the head with chair shot, because especially in black
Surfaces of these problems exist. Still have made image that looks better.
This grade now, I have noticed that we still have a maken added
is: On the Tv SonyBravia with HV30 (HDMI-connected), even when quite a lot of white ants occur, I am not the noise, but really 1 / 2 seconds remaining white dots, is that normal? (as far as I know, it happens if you have any radio absorbs radiation)
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Uv filter of SpiritX ... I use UV filter, because more sharpness will achieve at least a few percent more ... How WoWu said: Their eponymous role, just UV light back, now plays virtually no role, because the cameras create very well alone. Importantly, such a UV filter (alternatively clear filters), but as a mechanical protection of the front lens against dust, rain, fingerprints and even more so not everything has to be looking for. BUT: If you have more sharpness, then I would a high-quality UV filter to use, no NoName product.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
more sharpness, then I would a high-quality UV filter to use, no NoName product. I might get to the filter more or less abandon, but the
Mirror lens is the problem
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Alexanderdergrosse
Hello ..
So I see two pictures on the label of reflection WW adapter.
With superior UV filter so I can still understand that something s.einer flat surface reflects ... but if nothing is sitting in front of the lens .... where should reflect what we have?
Moreover, the sharp writing almost ... which focuses the camera? Is it in the macro setting?
Antwort von LarsProgressiv:
Hello everybody!
Can it be that the reflection from the camera lens and not coming forth from WW?
That would mean that the camera lens is pretty much (litter-) light and a surface s.einer WW-Lens will be mirrored.
If the converter properly draufgeschraubt?
Regards
Lars
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
Hello and thank you!
Moreover, the sharp writing almost ... which focuses the camera? Is it in the macro setting? The focus on black-colored leather armchair boss.
The fact is the default setting for filming.
Can it be that the reflection from the camera lens and not coming forth from WW? When I do the WW-Converter take away, there are no problems anymore.
So is the WW-Converter s.dem entire debt, as far as I know
Raynox belong to the very good WW-Converter. Aufgeschraubt everything is correct. Synonymous've noticed that just at the black areas Lens comes. I will in any case with WW filming.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Alexanderdergrosse
But if the writing is mirrored by the WW .... then it is the part before the WW and when next it is nothing, nothing can be mirrored synonymous ... Take the UV Lens s.oder Get a "behind the WW and in front of the camera used.
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
@ Alexanderdergrosse
But if the writing is mirrored by the WW .... then it is the part before the WW and when next it is nothing, nothing can be mirrored synonymous ... Take the UV Lens s.oder Get a "behind the WW and in front of the camera used. That I thought synonymous, behind the Lens zuzulegen WW.
but was incredible is that without UV will also be mirrored,
only not so strong. Ganz can not get away right?
Antwort von WoWu:
So I can not really s.Strahlen believe the 180 ° back into the Lens s.irgend run without something to be mirrored.
Throw away the part when you are such artifacts einhandelt and try the next part in the store first.
The other possibility is that really what Lars writes that the Spieglung of the objective lens of the last s.der WW is .... that would only mean that the camera in extreme macro focus ..... and that scattered light in the interstice of WW and Lens is .... or the inner ring is not burnished.
versuch times but the name clearly legible in order to determine whether items or WW is ... but there is actually nothing more than the items
Only then will you like the effect of the macro-focus made. So make something other than the black chair backs or publishing sharp 'but look at the manual focus in a normal range.
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
Now, thanks s.Euch people, I will the next time the thing ironed out try, thanks for the tips!
Antwort von WoWu:
But tell me know what it was ....
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
yes, clearly, I say the days
Antwort von kuhea:
Hello,
I do not know what the UV filter should be. This is a relic from the chemical and photography where Lenses Lens had only 3-4. Since UV light came through and made good on the film wg. the other wavelength blurred. With today's zoom lenses Viellinsigen UV light has no chance. Makes sense only a UV filter as lens protection against Verschutzungen.
A visual sharpness improvement brings a UV filter is not. In contrary. a lens is a precisely calculated optical system. Each additional, be it a filter, a converter or something else, the optical performance deteriorates.
Greeting Kuhea
Antwort von comix:
Hello,
I do not know what the UV filter should be. This is a relic from the chemical and photography where Lenses Lens had only 3-4. Since UV light came through and made good on the film wg. the other wavelength blurred. With today's zoom lenses Viellinsigen UV light has no chance. Makes sense only a UV filter as lens protection against Verschutzungen.
A visual sharpness improvement brings a UV filter is not. In contrary. a lens is a precisely calculated optical system. Each additional, be it a filter, a converter or something else, the optical performance deteriorates.
Greeting Kuhea Ditto. Prefer a sun visor before, has almost the same protection. If something is really on the lens really should, then synonymous protects the UV filter is not afraid.
Antwort von alexanderdergrosse:
Have a lot rumexperimentiert, the lens is reflected mostly in black,
but when next go away (of black areas) and the auto
manual adjust the mirror comes to light less.
Unfortunately, the mirror appears synonymous if only a little, anyway.
UV filter, I have only weggemacht and WW with Tülpe drauf made.
(But I see a difference between UV-filter with or without UV-filter: the pictures are of my taste and contrasting how to be.)
Thanks, folks!
Antwort von kurt-schuler:
Hello
I've just bought the HV30
in the order of ww I was one of
adapter (metal colors) is not recommended due to reflections.
Antwort von WoWu:
A good advice
Fujinon Lens had one nachbessern, simply because three tiny screws in the beam of the lens is not burnished and lighting effects were created.
