Frage von Isekram:
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Great statement - rubber are 100 points on my scale.
Kuck times in your
pre-made thread. Den hab I thank you enough times.
Antwort von Markus:
Perhaps Isekram leads the (non-) view expressed yes something from?
_________________
Sincerely,
by moderator
Antwort von Debonnaire:
What, please, go here?
This thread consists of nothing as a heading next. Zero content. What does the poster?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
"For smaller movies of activities s.Arbeitsplatz tomorrow I must buy a simple camcorder."
Hi,
there is a price for the impertinent questioner, so you would have the unquestionable eingesackt now.
At 20:00 You ask a question and four hours later, - perhaps because of the EM-France-Italy game, ever forget it thought - nobody reported, but then moan.
NOTE YOU ACTUALLY STILL WHAT? Your questions can incidentally with a minimum s.Suche just here in the forum itself answer - relating to "the advantages of tape" I myself have worn out a series of keyboards.
Presumably you have yourself on the sofa rumgelümmelt, Aldi beer left and right chips, and football geguckt, while others should aufdröseln your worries.
So this does not work. Melde Dich mal prefer here may be that one or the other will be synonymous pitted reacts to you. Questions, as you have in YOUR particular case, quite times, please make YOU really elsewhere.
Antwort von Isekram:
According to the aforementioned 4 hours my first post had about 300 viewers, but not an answer.
Since I already knew that the question of purchase advice usually no or only useless answers I have received the outset of my problem is trying to help complete argument for a MiniDV camcorder, display.
Unfortunately without success.
Only on such provocative articles like this one always gets answers.
There is never an answer too.
Since everyone has his lust must mustard.
Even if it fünftausendste time.
Here it is not too stupid to say his opinion.
Even without that answer the thread would go on, saying nothing but full of good advice.
My original question remains, but without a viable next reply.
And since you really think the questioner should log off?
Antwort von Markus:
According to the aforementioned 4 hours my first post had about 300 viewers, but not an answer. There are many users who do (almost) all new questions to read, but not all can contribute something synonymous. Sometimes synonymous, I have the impression that synonymous WebCrawler indexing by the number of visitors hochtreibt. In another forum in which I am active, the forum software does not differ and there are then some unrealistically high traffic established.
The number of hits on a thread, I would not be fully seen as a valuation yardstick.
Since I already knew that the question of purchase advice usually no or only useless answers received ... This is particularly true when the question itself reads like many other synonymous - the discussions themselves had read them. Leaders in the requirements are the keywords "cheap as possible" and "Lowlight". Something then of course no one more fun, since the camcorder models every week is not synonymous change fundamentally.
Only on such provocative articles like this one always gets answers. That is unfortunately true. Constructive proposals for how this could improve. I'm always open. :-)
And since you really think the questioner should log off? If anyone would like unsubscribe, this time in a Fettnapf force, then this forum would probably Accuracy 0 participants. ;-)
_________________
Sincerely,
by moderator
