Frage von gamp1981:
Hello
I am a beginner in the film, but feels very happy with a good camera to start my career. I need the camera for vacation footage, sports (volleyball) and other things like family and Co. ..
I have the panasonic & sony already had in their hands. At first glance I like the sony really good! after a little advice of the seller should, however, I tend to concentrate on panasonic following reasons. Firstly there is the multifunktionsrad to adjust the focus, etc. I'm very excited, because you can very quickly or very focussieren manual zoom exactly! Moreover, the auto focus function in the panasonic is much faster compared to the sony! synonymous in the visual display on the panasonic was "sharper" and contrasting. than I do in the department store in dark areas of movies convinced me to turn pana! Moreover, the automatic mode the pana super easy because it will very quickly detect whether portrait or landscape receptive!
Now I read in various reviews, the focus of pana in comparison to sony and canon can not keep up?! I am not quite next now! can someone please help a decision between the three camcorders give?
ever thank you in advance!
Antwort von RickyMartini:
HDD camcorders are designed for sports shots an absolute no-go!
The plate could be made very quickly dropped the last recording made. ;)
Therefore, I recommend the Canon HF100 (600 ¬), with the SDHC card slot (16GB for 2h video for less than 25 ¬) and hence no problems with extreme situations has.
The AF of the HF100 is very good, the low-light behavior is also - here comes the Sony Not with.
In addition, it is nice and small and portable and can be used in many a pocket and place.
But please believe that you have a video player for the PC need of H.264 can play a suitable video editing program (with s.besten Intermediate Codec), lots of space for DV editing and additional hard disks for data storage - because if away then gone! ;)
Antwort von heimax:
I film with the SonySR 11, the sensitivity of the hard drive I have in the 18 months still nothing found. Fast movements over with Tripod, which is not to be recordings Hundesport bypass is no detectable damage. Even the intent aufgeschraubte wide forgives a lot. I would buy again jederezeit. Besides movies, I still with the pocket camera TG1 I treat about the same.
An undisputed advantage of the SR11 is the Viewfinder, the very bright conditions when the display with nothing left to do is still a good recording control permits.
mags
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Then my concern is no longer entitled - Thanks for the info!
Antwort von domain:
Kannst dir ja mal synonymous, the JVC GZ-HD40 watch over the SR12 has some drawbacks (notably missing viewfinders), but the advantage in many ways a hybrid camera to be. Records of HDV on Full-HD AVCHD to mpeg2 and also anything on either the AVCHD 120 GB hard drive or SDHC memory cards, which are widespread in cell phones. Of a 16 GB chip in the camera, the other for the mobile reserve and you're ready for all emergencies, like the SR12, or even better.
Antwort von heimax:
And you have to say is that the sharpness in the JVC is not s.die Sonyheranreicht. My first HD camera was a JVC because of Sony was not yet available. Once Sonyeine HD Camera I had sold the JVC and the first bought the SR1 which I appear in the SR 11 sold in order to switch to full HD. Only with the processing at the beginning, I had some small problems, but since the software manufacturer software has delivered the synonymous done. I work mainly with Power Director and Magix Video Pro X
Gruss mags
Antwort von domain:
Exactly the opposite is the case, since the new JVC 1 / 3 "CMOS sensors used. The image quality is better than the SonySR 11, you can already test s.den photos in Slashcam recognize and is nearly at the level of HF 100, which in the basic setting of the HF100 and in the test images is not an art piece, but quite crisp on the base including a striking contrast sharpening is due. The SR11 is still softer image than the JVC, which is generally considered advantageous characteristics.
Antwort von heimax:
I have the test compared pictures. So weak Aufahmen my SR11 has never been delivered. Anyway I think the test is not really that my SR11 has partial characteristics of the test negative.
Clearly my opinion is colored, because I'm a Sonyfan because of all the devices Sonydie I ever had to the full satisfaction and work with equipment of JVC and Panasonic always something was not right. Also the support of Sony, at least in Switzerland, is convincing. Unlike JVC, where the Product Manager the properties do not even know their devices. Therefore, I advise always to Sony.
Greetings from the Swiss mountains mags
Antwort von gamp1981:
hey
first thank for the numerous tips and answer. I like the jvc optical good, but they have not yet had their hands! tests carried out at the cuts but worse s.als sony and co. However, I know not whether the test carried out at all representative, because the performance of the tests will certainly yes monetary synonymous of the manufacturers, as is the case everywhere, well ...
in the panasonic, you can turn off the disk and just synonymous with sports etc. on ne memory card! is the synonymous with the sony?
how does it because that is the auto focus when sony Unlike pana so "slow" is? is the quality of canon and sony serious or even recognizable?
how important is the rapid adjustment of manual focus and this works out in the sony fairly quickly?
I think one advantage of the sony are synonymous determines the high-resolution photos, right?
but if you purely objective test based on various reports of the verdict, then cuts the sony s.besten as well!
regards
