Frage von Pillermännchen:
Hello,
I would like to digitize VHS video of a cheap camcorder growth.
This brauchts but probably only one analog input, right?
I also want to ensure that the mini-DV tapes on my FX1 Calculator drag to the drive of Sonyzu unharmed.
I think for these two tasks would be synonymous of what eBay are second hand.
Has someone a tip for a brand or any other comment on this?
Jens
Antwort von Markus:
This brauchts but probably only one analog input, right? Yes. And s.besten a digital conversion without recording to MiniDV.
I also want to ensure that the mini-DV tapes on my FX1 Calculator pull ... The FX1 is an HDV camcorder. For HDV recording on capture needs an HDV camcorder or recorder. But the IMO does not have analog inputs.
A dilemma.
Antwort von Pillermännchen:
Ok
Let the second time out ...
I need is a camera with analog / digital converter.
Why it should not be diverted over the tape be?
And after what camera you should look out there?
Jens
Antwort von Markus:
Holst Why you will not be correct A / D converter, eg of Canopus? For the price would be even an ADVC-300 drin?
Antwort von Pillermännchen:
Costs 500, - EUR +
Because heat is not a SonyHDR-HC3E interesting?
Thus, I would have the additional possibility to detail the FX1 with an opportunity to the static shot.
But then synonymous reaches a somewhat simpler picture.
Antwort von Markus:
So again very slowly: The HC3 has no analog inputs and may therefore not necessarily synonymous analog video digitizer. This lends itself as a player HDV, when capturing the FX1 should be spared.
The Canopus A / D converter can Videozuspielungen analog digitizer, but no HDV video playback.
So the question is: What are you looking for?
Antwort von Pillermännchen:
Of course the eierlegende Wollmillsau.
If the thing be synonymous still a good coffee can do ...
Seriously:
I would be ready for a good solution to spend money.
The converter is me with less than 500 euros is too expensive for what he can.
Namely digitizer.
When I was drauflege, I to acquire a reasonably good, but still cheap camera, with which I still synonymous occasional additional tasks, if the FX1 with the details is employed.
But I already wrote that.
I am looking for is a camera, the analog input via a digitizer, which I regard as roundworms and capture bondage abuse can
the synonymous occasionally for a shot (although the picture quality is not as s.die Sonyherranreichen must) will be deployed and, logically,
the (new or used) is significantly cheaper than my FX1 to be.
Is quite simple. :)
Jens
Antwort von Markus:
I am looking for is a camera, the analog input via a digitizer, which I regard as roundworms and capture bondage abuse, which occasionally synonymous for a shot (although the picture quality is not as s.die Sonyherranreichen must) will be deployed and, logically, the (new or used) is significantly cheaper than my FX1 to be.
Is quite simple. :) This is really simple: such a camcorder, there are currently not.
What the A / D converter, the only reason I had the ADVC-300, because of the price range of cheaper DV camcorder is. If you do not need DV camcorder, you had the money in a better synonymous converter can invest.
Alternatively, there is still synonymous the other end of the (Canopus-) scale, namely the ADVC-55 for 178 ¬ now or the ADVC-50 for 168 ¬.
