Frage von Eisbär:
Hi,
I would like now synonymous with HD filming. However, still have no HDTV flat screen and not just synonymous to buy. I go for at least two years after Australia and wish there synonymous underwater filming. Housing, I would but only because of the size of the HC1 or HC3 in question.
Would be for underwater shots either HC1 or HC3 take. The HC3 would be my favorite because I have inner housing had more space and can be synonymous else about the case not much set except for standard functions. But they say yes, the recordings of the HC3 had something more natural than for the HC1?!
For recording s.Land I thought s.eine HC1 or FX1. Bildqualtität is for me the A and O. Although I often synonymous read that the HC1 and the FX1 is beeinander pretty close to what the Bildqualtität concerned, is this so?
Why should I pay more and buy an FX1? Good, looks professional and probably from the FX1 synonymous has more to offer than a HC1. To me it's at basically the picture of.
Moreover, it could be shown so that I am in Australia with the cam a little money can earn. At least I would like to try a job in this direction to get.
If I should buy the FX1, I would sooner or later for a professional underwater housing variant decide. Amphibico Phenom ...
What would you recommend me, I think the HC3 is likely in any case for underwater.
Thanks for the help
Gruss
eisbär
Antwort von Eisbär:
achso, one more thing:
should I buy a new unit or would prefer a second hand, because I do two years in Australia will be?
This would I buy a used FX1 influence, or what will happen then with the warranty from?
Gruss
Eisbär
Antwort von Gundel:
Take the HC1
Makes a good picture recognition, it costs only half a FX1 and, most importantly, is so much smaller than them that they are synonymous you anywhere mitnimmst.
I have the FX1 and am satisfied so far as synonymous.
Only artet each occurrence with her in from a session and just when I'm so, I never came up with the idea that they mitzuschleppen.
If the HC1 s.Produktionsende sag should be priced, I'll get it as a standby camera to do so.
Antwort von Eisbär:
Hi Gundel,
the HC1's just so very very rare to buy somewhere. Used it's always risk, no preference which of the three, it will be.
I thought only stop if I already have the opportunity to come to Australia, then I would like synonymous in the recordings have adequate quality. The FX1 has 3CCD and because the HC1 is not quite as good as I have read on fxsupport.de. I let me be happy synonymous what cost, but would leave the FX1 if absolutely new, still buy this year because of VAT. Should I stop hurrying, if not someone spent a good sold. Used would be me because the two-year stay abroad s.liebsten.
Antwort von Gundel:
Your decision.
But I have fantastic pictures of Sonnuntergängen, blitzumrankten thunderclouds and synonymous of a foreign landing an aircraft on the field.
Made with a small Canon Powershot A700, in the pocket and place.
That was my neighbor popel.
He has been a EOS350 purchased. With Lens and all drum and turn.
But besides his birthday, s.dem he wished the camera, he has not yet photographed.
He simply does not buck the rubble everywhere mitzuschleppen.
What uses as any chip, or the resolution?
The Picture is the message.
Antwort von Eisbär:
Can please times a Gracious Admin the trouble here and I mistakenly published topic in the field of purchase advice slide. Had super! Thank you.
Use because the three HDR Batteries all the same, or at least two of them?
Which of these three is because full-HD at all or can? What does it 1440x1080? I thought Full HD is 1980x1080 pixel.
I les quite a lot in earlier contributions, but still reminds me of the decision is not easy. The HC3 has no turn Microphone input and synonymous lens ring diameter is only 30mm. How does this affect the image quality with a wide, diameter of 37mm has been designed from? Some reinforced Randunschärfen?
Had interest s.einer used HC1 or HC3.
FX1 is synonymous needed progress.
Gruss
Eisbär
Antwort von bjoerni:
On Slashcam's a very good side comparison of camcorders. Your choice models are synonymous in it, with values of Lowlight properties, and all pipapo Resolutions:
http://www.camcorder-test.com/
Antwort von Eisbär:
Meanwhile, I am in the FX7. This seems to me now but very much to be liked. Why not?
Antwort von ruessel:
The price.
Antwort von Eisbär:
Hello RUSSELS,
did you want to say that they are still too expensive? Does that mean now that you FX7 would not recommend, except maybe if they would be even cheaper? I have many clips of your views and find the pictures of the FX7 actually quite ok, but probably refers to your last post more on the Austattungstechnische, is not it?
Many believe that the FX7 is a decline instead of progress. Can it stand for?
Antwort von Markus:
Can please times a Gracious Admin the trouble here and I mistakenly published topic in the field of purchase advice slide. Thanks for the hint. To lift you s.of all those questioners that smooth a new, identical discussion in the right column had started. ;-)
Antwort von ruessel:
but probably relates to your last post more on the Austattungstechnische, is not it? Likewise, I see that the Canon A1 for 3250 Euros but just has a new HDV scale laid. In price and equipment!
