Frage von filmfix:
Good people!
some have cameras and audio sources so mini jack, RCA, etc., when the lower synonymous changes in the price-time fortunately. now was
My rationale, a di-box in between, the XLR cable. And since I hold
synonymous in jack feed, again a di-box (and this time no active), only
vice versa. But, that does not? So it is possible the Behringer DI 600 will not make easy or otherwise is a thinking error?
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Your request is kept very rough and general. Therefore, it is virtually impossible to give a concrete answer. (Camera type, present microphones, intended use)
I guess because you did not write it: You want to use a long microphone cable.
Let's start s.der camera page. There you can use an inverted direct box (with some adapters), but it Monacor of under 100/15 Bezechnung ginbt a transformer, the balanced XLR microphone connections implement a mono jack 6,3 mm. (So that's a "ready-inverted DI-Box" is). You must still implement of the big catch on a mini-jack (Actually, you can cut the large jacks synonymous and solder a mini Kline. Perhaps this makes for some ¬ synonymous a TV technician or electronics technician)
At the other end of the cable you close more sense as a microphone with balanced XLR-on connection.
If one has not because he wants to continue with its old use mini-jack (must), then here come another adapter to use: mini-jack to 6.3mm jack. Thus in a DI box.
I am of the opinion that one should not do it.
As for the connection of other audio sources s.die Camera, it is synonymous here, the distance (the desired length) to the camera followed. For short distances you can directly use an appropriate (!) RCA to mini jack adapter. But: Most cameras are set up s.Miniklinkeneingang to microphone level. Another source will override this input mercilessly. Remedy here is a voltage divider, for longer distances, we can again apply the construct of above, except that instead of the microphone connected a DI box. Most DI boxes have optional "ATT". With the setting "-20 db" You should be a simple line signal PERMIT lowered to Mikrononniveau.
All these solutions are connected with the use of a suitable adapter and / or tinkering.
More details, if you can make more concrete information.
Antwort von filmfix:
thanks! yes, it comes to long cord. a line signal, I have a (active) di-box chic, but not simply an adapter into the camera
wants to eat - or: the line is indeed a symmetric, but this is
of the perceived mini jack connection or is it? or should I ever again a di-box (just the other way around and probably only passively) in between. That is the question!
Antwort von thos-berlin:
So. A line signal is balanced on a DI-Box and is on a longer balanced XLR cable s.die Camera.
use an adapter on the camera side, but a transformer (or, if you really want this, an inverted DI-Box) This may be the Monacor 100/15. Which is basically a "reverse direct box" and is made for such things.
His only shortcoming is that he has no mini-jack output side. Since you need a suitable adapter or something tinkering. Note: The services for Videanwendungen XLR-mini jack adapter adapter only, no transformer. With the use of the signal is asymmetric, (which for short connections but is OK, but not for you).
Otherwise: If the DI box of the cable route s.Beginn active or passive, is absolutely no preference. If the camera has no line-in, you have already set this to -20 db. Thus, the signal level is transmitted to the microphone with camera, which is perfectly fine.
